Notley R G
J R Soc Med. 1982 Nov;75(11):871-4. doi: 10.1177/014107688207501109.
Four hundred patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate have been studied. An intermittent irrigation resectoscope was used in 200, and a continuous irrigation resectoscope in the remainder. The merits and demerits of continuous irrigation resection are discussed in the light of the results of these operations. The conclusion reached is that the continuous irrigation resectoscope has considerable advantages over the intermittent flow instrument. These advantages are most evident in the difficult operation, or in operations on the larger prostate, as well as in the tuition and demonstration of endoscopic surgery.
对400例接受经尿道前列腺切除术的患者进行了研究。其中200例使用间歇性冲洗电切镜,其余患者使用持续性冲洗电切镜。根据这些手术的结果,讨论了持续性冲洗电切术的优缺点。得出的结论是,持续性冲洗电切镜比间歇性冲洗器械具有相当大的优势。这些优势在困难手术、较大前列腺手术以及内镜手术的教学和演示中最为明显。