Adler B, Faine S
J Med Microbiol. 1982 May;15(2):259-62. doi: 10.1099/00222615-15-2-259.
CBA/N mice, which could not produce antibodies against lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from either Escherichia coli or Leptospira interrogans serovar pomona, produced levels of agglutinating antibodies against leptospires similar to those produced by immunologically normal CBA mice. CBA/N mice were thus resistant to acute leptospiral infection and CBA/N immune serum passively protected immunosuppressed mice from infection. The results suggest that antibodies against LPS are not important in protection against experimental leptospiral infection in mice.
CBA/N小鼠无法产生针对大肠杆菌或波摩那群问号钩端螺旋体脂多糖(LPS)的抗体,但其产生的针对钩端螺旋体的凝集抗体水平与免疫正常的CBA小鼠相似。因此,CBA/N小鼠对急性钩端螺旋体感染具有抗性,并且CBA/N免疫血清能被动保护免疫抑制小鼠免受感染。这些结果表明,抗LPS抗体在小鼠实验性钩端螺旋体感染的保护中并不重要。