Smith T W, Buchan P, Parsons D N, Wilkinson S
Life Sci. 1982;31(12-13):1205-8. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(82)90343-5.
Morphine and N-methyl morphine were compared in two antinociceptive tests in mice, the hotplate and acetic acid-induced writhing. Whereas morphine was active in both models, N-methyl morphine was only active in the writhing model. In this model, the antinociceptive effects of N-methyl morphine were antagonized by both naloxone and N-methyl nalorphine. In separate experiments the two quaternary analogues were both [14C]-labelled and shown not to penetrate the blood brain barrier. These results indicate a peripheral site of action for the opioid antinociceptive effects of N-methyl morphine in the writhing model.
在小鼠的两种抗伤害感受试验(热板试验和乙酸诱导扭体试验)中对吗啡和N-甲基吗啡进行了比较。吗啡在两种模型中均有活性,而N-甲基吗啡仅在扭体模型中有活性。在该模型中,N-甲基吗啡的抗伤害感受作用被纳洛酮和N-甲基纳洛啡拮抗。在单独的实验中,两种季铵类似物均用[14C]标记,并显示不能穿透血脑屏障。这些结果表明在扭体模型中,N-甲基吗啡的阿片样物质抗伤害感受作用的作用部位在外周。