Virsu V, Rovamo J, Laurinen P, Näsänen R
Vision Res. 1982;22(9):1211-7. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90087-6.
We measured temporal and spatial contrast sensitivity functions of foveal and peripheral photopic vision at various locations in the nasal visual field. Sensitivity decreased monotonically with increasing eccentricity when it was measured by using the same test gratings at different eccentricities. When the gratings were normalized in area, spatial frequency, and translation velocity by means of the cortical magnification factor M so that the calculated cortical representations of the gratings became equivalent at different eccentricities, the temporal contrast sensitivity functions became similar at all eccentricities. The normalization was effective under all experimental conditions that included various kinds of temporal modulation from 0 to 25 Hz (movement, counterphase flicker and on-off flicker) and different threshold tasks (detection, orientation discrimination, and discrimination of movement direction), independently of the subjective appearances of the gratings at threshold. We conclude that central and peripheral vision are qualitatively similar in spatiotemporal visual performance. The quantitative differences observed without normalization seem to be caused by the spatial sampling properties of retinal ganglion cells that are directly related to the values of M used in the normalization.
我们测量了鼻侧视野不同位置处中央凹和周边明视觉的时间和空间对比敏感度函数。当在不同偏心度下使用相同测试光栅进行测量时,敏感度随偏心度增加而单调下降。当通过皮质放大因子M对光栅的面积、空间频率和平移速度进行归一化,以使不同偏心度下光栅的计算皮质表征变得等效时,所有偏心度下的时间对比敏感度函数变得相似。在包括从0到25Hz的各种时间调制(运动、反相闪烁和开-关闪烁)以及不同阈值任务(检测、方向辨别和运动方向辨别)的所有实验条件下,归一化都是有效的,与阈值处光栅的主观外观无关。我们得出结论,中央视觉和周边视觉在时空视觉性能上在质量上是相似的。未进行归一化时观察到的定量差异似乎是由视网膜神经节细胞的空间采样特性引起的,这些特性与归一化中使用的M值直接相关。