Suppr超能文献

四种新生儿快速血糖测定方法的比较分析

Comparative analysis of four methods for rapid glucose determination in neonates.

作者信息

Perelman R H, Gutcher G R, Engle M J, MacDonald M J

出版信息

Am J Dis Child. 1982 Dec;136(12):1051-3. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1982.03970480017003.

Abstract

As an important aspect of newborn care, the rapid assessment of glucose homeostasis is often accomplished by a glucose oxidase-peroxidase chromagen test strip method, either alone or with a reflectance colorimeter. The precision of these techniques has been established, but few studies have determined accuracy in an intensive care setting. We performed the following study. During the time of routine heelstick blood sampling, the nurses collected 90 complete study sets for glucose analysis from 43 neonates. Dextrostix, Ames Meter, Chemstrip bG, and Stat Tek Meter determinations were performed according to manufacturers' instructions. Concurrent determination of blood glucose level by a glucose analyzer (Beckman) served as a standard for comparison. There was no significant difference in estimation of true blood glucose concentration among the rapid methods tested. The marked variability of results suggests only modest accuracy in estimating whole blood glucose concentration when employed in the routine neonatal clinical setting. These data indicate that the results from rapid blood glucose estimation techniques require confirmation by conventional laboratory methods prior to therapeutic intervention.

摘要

作为新生儿护理的一个重要方面,葡萄糖稳态的快速评估通常通过葡萄糖氧化酶-过氧化物酶显色试纸法单独进行,或与反射比色计一起使用来完成。这些技术的精度已经得到确立,但很少有研究确定其在重症监护环境中的准确性。我们进行了以下研究。在常规足跟采血期间,护士从43名新生儿中收集了90套完整的用于葡萄糖分析的研究样本。按照制造商的说明进行Dextrostix、Ames Meter、Chemstrip bG和Stat Tek Meter测定。用葡萄糖分析仪(贝克曼)同时测定血糖水平作为比较标准。在所测试的快速方法中,对真实血糖浓度的估计没有显著差异。结果的显著变异性表明,在常规新生儿临床环境中使用时,估计全血葡萄糖浓度的准确性仅为中等。这些数据表明,在进行治疗干预之前,快速血糖估计技术的结果需要通过传统实验室方法进行确认。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验