• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺活检后的感染问题:经会阴途径的情况

The problem of infection after prostatic biopsy: the case for the transperineal approach.

作者信息

Thompson P M, Pryor J P, Williams J P, Eyers D E, Dulake C, Scully M F, Kakkar V V

出版信息

Br J Urol. 1982 Dec;54(6):736-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1982.tb13637.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410x.1982.tb13637.x
PMID:7150932
Abstract

The incidence of infection after needle biopsy of the prostate by different techniques was compared in 45 patients. Aerobic and anaerobic culture was made of the biopsy needle, prostate, urine and blood. In addition, endotoxin assays were determined by a new chromogenic method using Limulus lysate. All of the patients undergoing transrectal biopsy were found to have a bacteraemia; 27% were symptomatic and 87% had a post-operative urinary tract infection. A double-blind controlled trial using cefamandole with the premedication showed a significant reduction in the incidence of bacteraemia to 53% and the prevention of a urinary tract infection. Following transperineal biopsy, although the incidence of bacteraemia was 40% and urinary tract infection 27%, none of these patients was symptomatic and the organisms causing the bacteraemia were predominantly skin contaminants. The endotoxin assays showed differences between the groups with higher endotoxin values in the unprotected transrectal group.

摘要

对45例患者采用不同技术进行前列腺穿刺活检后的感染发生率进行了比较。对活检针、前列腺、尿液和血液进行需氧和厌氧培养。此外,采用一种新的使用鲎试剂的显色法测定内毒素。所有接受经直肠活检的患者均出现菌血症;27%有症状,87%有术后尿路感染。一项使用头孢孟多并进行术前用药的双盲对照试验显示,菌血症发生率显著降低至53%,并预防了尿路感染。经会阴活检后,虽然菌血症发生率为40%,尿路感染发生率为27%,但这些患者均无症状,引起菌血症的微生物主要是皮肤污染物。内毒素检测显示不同组之间存在差异,未受保护的经直肠组内毒素值较高。

相似文献

1
The problem of infection after prostatic biopsy: the case for the transperineal approach.前列腺活检后的感染问题:经会阴途径的情况
Br J Urol. 1982 Dec;54(6):736-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1982.tb13637.x.
2
[Investigation of infection risk and the value of antibiotic prophylaxis during transrectal biopsy of the prostate by endotoxin determination].[通过内毒素测定探讨经直肠前列腺穿刺活检期间的感染风险及抗生素预防的价值]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2004 Jul;10(7):496-8, 502.
3
Bacteraemia following perineal prostatic biopsy.会阴前列腺活检后的菌血症
Br J Urol. 1987 Sep;60(3):252-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1987.tb05493.x.
4
[Comparison of ultrasound-guided transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsies in clinical application].超声引导经直肠与经会阴前列腺穿刺活检的临床应用比较
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2014 Nov;20(11):1004-7.
5
A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy.经会阴与经直肠12针前列腺穿刺活检诊断效能的前瞻性随机对照研究
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11(2):134-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500985. Epub 2007 May 29.
6
Prophylactic antibiotics and Foley catheter use in transperineal needle biopsy of the prostate.预防性抗生素及导尿管在经会阴前列腺穿刺活检中的应用
J Urol. 1984 Apr;131(4):687-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50580-7.
7
[Infection and sepsis prevention in prostate biopsy].[前列腺活检中的感染与脓毒症预防]
Urologe A. 2013 Oct;52(10):1459-68; quiz 1467-8. doi: 10.1007/s00120-013-3284-4.
8
Effect of circumcision on prostatic bacterial colonization and subsequent bacterial seeding following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies.
Tech Urol. 2001 Dec;7(4):305-9.
9
Does disposable needle guide minimize infectious complications after transrectal prostate needle biopsy?一次性针引导器能否将经直肠前列腺穿刺活检后的感染并发症降至最低?
Urology. 2008 Jun;71(6):1024-7; discussion 1027-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.160. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
10
Morbidity after transperineal prostate biopsy in 3000 patients undergoing 12 vs 18 vs more than 24 needle cores.3000 例患者行经会阴前列腺穿刺活检:12 针、18 针与超过 24 针核心针的术后发病率比较。
Urology. 2013 Jun;81(6):1142-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.02.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Hundred years of transperineal prostate biopsy.经会阴前列腺活检百年历程。
Ther Adv Urol. 2022 May 21;14:17562872221100590. doi: 10.1177/17562872221100590. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
Are outpatient transperineal prostate biopsies without antibiotic prophylaxis equivalent to standard transrectal biopsies for patient safety and cancer detection rates?A retrospective cohort study in 222 patients.对于患者安全和癌症检出率而言,不进行抗生素预防的门诊经会阴前列腺活检与标准经直肠活检是否等效?一项针对222例患者的回顾性队列研究。
Patient Saf Surg. 2021 Aug 21;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13037-021-00303-8.
3
Reconciling Hygiene and Cleanliness: A New Perspective from Human Microbiome.
协调卫生与清洁:来自人类微生物组的新视角
Indian J Microbiol. 2020 Mar;60(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s12088-019-00839-5. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
Prospective Monitoring and Adapting Strategies for Prevention of Infection Following Transrectal Prostate Procedures.经直肠前列腺手术后预防感染的前瞻性监测与调整策略
Urol Pract. 2018 Mar;5(2):124-131. doi: 10.1016/j.urpr.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
5
The global burden of major infectious complications following prostate biopsy.前列腺活检后主要感染性并发症的全球负担。
Epidemiol Infect. 2016 Jun;144(8):1784-91. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815002885. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
6
Epidural abscess with associated spondylodiscitis following prostatic biopsy.前列腺活检后并发脊椎骨髓炎的硬膜外脓肿。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 Jul;97(5):e81-2. doi: 10.1308/003588415X14181254790563.
7
Quinolone prophylaxis in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: an eight-year single center experience.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检中喹诺酮类药物预防感染:一项为期八年的单中心经验
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Dec 23;2013:452107. doi: 10.1155/2013/452107. eCollection 2013.
8
Transperineal biopsy of the prostate--is this the future?经会阴前列腺穿刺活检——这是未来的趋势吗?
Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Dec;10(12):690-702. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.195. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
9
Efficacy of prophylactic single-dose therapy using fluoroquinolone for prostate brachytherapy.氟喹诺酮类药物预防性单剂量治疗在前列腺近距离放射治疗中的疗效。
Jpn J Radiol. 2012 May;30(4):317-22. doi: 10.1007/s11604-012-0053-z.
10
Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.经直肠前列腺活检的抗生素预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 May 11(5):CD006576. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006576.pub2.