Stevens J T, Sumner D D
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1982 Aug;19(6-7):781-805. doi: 10.3109/15563658208990404.
In the search to define the mechanisms by which xenobiotics produce their toxic effects in biological systems, the importance of metabolism data is clear. Although the detection of electrophilic metabolites and reactive intermediates may challenge our analytical technology, the toxic responses manifested by these agents are often obvious. The identification of toxicologically significant minor metabolites may exceed the state of the art in analytical methodology. New advances in technology may provide the needed answers. As we begin to face the significance of activation reactions, particularly in the area of carcinogenesis, it becomes apparent that metabolism to electrophiles that react covalently with DNA, is not the only mechanism by which the tumorigenic response is produced. The production of tumors by nongenotoxic (epigenetic) means is also important. Exposure to high and sustained levels of exposure to a xenobiotic that leads to a perturbation in metabolic, endocrine or physiologic pathways or tissue injury may also produce tumors. Only through investigations which include definitive metabolite identification and quantitation can the mechanism by which these agents exert their toxicity be identified. The ramification of dose response relationships for genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens will be presented to demonstrate the impact of metabolite identification in quantitative risk estimation.
在探寻外源性物质在生物系统中产生毒性作用的机制时,代谢数据的重要性显而易见。尽管亲电代谢物和反应性中间体的检测可能对我们的分析技术构成挑战,但这些物质所表现出的毒性反应往往很明显。鉴定具有毒理学意义的微量代谢物可能超出了现有分析方法的水平。技术上的新进展可能会提供所需的答案。当我们开始面对活化反应的重要性,尤其是在致癌作用领域时,很明显,代谢为与DNA发生共价反应的亲电物质并非产生致瘤反应的唯一机制。通过非遗传毒性(表观遗传)方式产生肿瘤也很重要。接触高剂量且持续暴露于导致代谢、内分泌或生理途径紊乱或组织损伤的外源性物质也可能产生肿瘤。只有通过包括明确代谢物鉴定和定量在内的研究,才能确定这些物质发挥毒性的机制。将介绍遗传毒性和非遗传毒性致癌物剂量反应关系的分支情况,以证明代谢物鉴定在定量风险评估中的影响。