Bross M, Borenstein M
Percept Mot Skills. 1982 Dec;55(3 Pt 1):963-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.1982.55.3.963.
Temporal auditory sensitivity was compared in five adventitiously blind and five normally sighted subjects in a signal-detection paradigm. Following determination of individual auditory flutter fusion (AFF) thresholds the subjects were required to make forced-choice responses between a fluttering and fused white noise under stimulus probabilities of 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75. From these data indices of sensory sensitivity (d') and response bias (Beta) were computed and compared. Analysis indicated no significant differences in auditory sensitivity between the two groups. These findings further weaken the traditional hypothesis of sensory compensation.
在信号检测范式中,对五名后天失明者和五名正常视力者的颞听觉敏感性进行了比较。在确定个体听觉颤动融合(AFF)阈值后,要求受试者在刺激概率为0.25、0.50和0.75的情况下,对颤动和融合的白噪声做出强制选择反应。根据这些数据计算并比较了感觉敏感性指标(d')和反应偏差(Beta)。分析表明,两组之间的听觉敏感性没有显著差异。这些发现进一步削弱了传统的感觉补偿假说。