• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单词和非单词中的字母识别,伴有视角变化和位置线索延迟。

Letter identification in words and non-words, with variation in visual angle and delay of position cue.

作者信息

Solman R T

出版信息

Perception. 1982;11(3):305-17. doi: 10.1068/p110305.

DOI:10.1068/p110305
PMID:7167339
Abstract

Two experiments are described in which subjects were required to report the name of a single position-cued 'critical' letter in a tachistoscopically displayed string of four letters. The stimulus characters were arranged to form three types of letter strings: (i) strings in which the letters did not form words; (ii) words in which contextual constraint of the critical letters was minimised; and (iii) words in which contextual constraint of the critical letters was maximised. The serial position of the letter to be identified in each string was cued at delays of -500, -100, and +500 ms, in experiment 1 and at delays of -510 and +510 ms in experiment 2, and in both experiments one group of subjects responded to letter strings which subtended a horizontal visual angle of 3.95 deg, while a second group responded to strings which subtended 1.02 deg. Correct identifications of critical letters showed that the presentation of words resulted in superior performance. This 'word superiority effect' is consistent with earlier findings implying that it has a perceptual locus. For the stimuli which subtended the large visual angle the word advantage was detrimentally affected only when the position of the critical letter to be identified was cued either 500 or 510 ms prior to the display of the letter string.

摘要

本文描述了两项实验,要求受试者报告在速示器上呈现的四个字母的字符串中,由位置提示的单个“关键”字母的名称。刺激字符被安排形成三种类型的字母串:(i)字母不构成单词的字符串;(ii)关键字母的上下文约束最小化的单词;(iii)关键字母的上下文约束最大化的单词。在实验1中,每个字符串中要识别的字母的序列位置在-500、-100和+500毫秒的延迟下被提示,在实验2中在-510和+510毫秒的延迟下被提示,并且在两个实验中,一组受试者对张角为3.95度的水平视角的字母串做出反应,而另一组受试者对张角为1.02度的字符串做出反应。对关键字母的正确识别表明,单词的呈现导致了更好的表现。这种“单词优势效应”与早期的研究结果一致,这意味着它具有感知位点。对于张角较大的刺激,只有当要识别的关键字母的位置在字母串显示前500或510毫秒被提示时,单词优势才会受到不利影响。

相似文献

1
Letter identification in words and non-words, with variation in visual angle and delay of position cue.单词和非单词中的字母识别,伴有视角变化和位置线索延迟。
Perception. 1982;11(3):305-17. doi: 10.1068/p110305.
2
Temporal separation of two part-letter arrays and size changes in a nonmasking work-superiority effect.两个部分字母阵列的时间分离以及非掩蔽工作优势效应中的大小变化。
Perception. 1987;16(5):655-69. doi: 10.1068/p160655.
3
Does meaning matter? The impact of word knowledge on lateral masking.意义重要吗?词汇知识对侧向掩蔽的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2001 Nov;78(11):831-8. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200111000-00013.
4
Word length and visual-noise texture in backward masking.反向掩蔽中的字长与视觉噪声纹理
Perception. 1976;5(2):211-5. doi: 10.1068/p050211.
5
Representation of letters when mislocation errors occur.
J Gen Psychol. 1990 Apr;117(2):143-51. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1990.9921131.
6
Stimulus orientation and the first-letter advantage.刺激方向与首字母优势
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
7
Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition.视觉单词识别中的字母可见性与观看位置效应
Percept Psychophys. 2003 Jan;65(1):133-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03194790.
8
The word superiority effect overcomes crowding.单词优势效应克服了拥挤现象。
Vision Res. 2024 Sep;222:108436. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108436. Epub 2024 May 30.
9
The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope.词优效应并不需要一个T形视野镜。
Percept Psychophys. 1992 May;51(5):473-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03211643.
10
Effects of stimulus duration and inter-letter spacing on letter-in-string identification.刺激持续时间和字母间距对字符串中字母识别的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.011. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrusion and location errors in the naming of letters in words and non-words.
Psychol Res. 1988;50(2):103-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00309209.