Solman R T
School of Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Perception. 1987;16(5):655-69. doi: 10.1068/p160655.
In two experiments subjects were asked to report the identity of a position-cued critical letter in an array of four letters. Four types of arrays were used: (i) unpronounceable nonwords; (ii) pronounceable nonwords ('pseudowords'); (iii) words in which the critical letter was minimally constrained by the context letters; and (iv) words in which the critical letter was maximally constrained by the context letters. All four-letter stimuli were presented in two parts. A leading array in which the information from two quadrants of a vertical by horizontal division of each letter was presented, and, after intervals of 0, 20, 40, 80, 100, 120, 160, 320, and 480 ms and infinity (ie, no trailing array), a trailing array of the complementary letter parts. In experiment 1 a single group of eight subjects responded to the one hundred and sixty combinations of the four types of letter strings, the four serial positions, and the ten stimulus onset asynchrony values. In experiment 2 the stimulus onset asynchrony values were varied among subjects, with twelve subjects responding at each value. The results from these two studies were generally similar. Performance in the word conditions was consistently superior to performance in the nonword conditions, and the magnitude of this difference (ie, the word-superiority effect) increased with increasing stimulus onset asynchrony up to 120 ms, and then gradually declined. The fact that the magnitude of the word-superiority effect initially increased with the separation of leading and trailing arrays was interpreted as support for Johnston's suggestion that letters in words are represented during visual encoding both in the form of individual letter percepts and in a decay-resistant word percept, as opposed to letters in nonwords, which are represented only as decay-susceptible letter percepts. The experimental findings are discussed in relation to the 'interactive activation' model of word perception.
在两项实验中,要求受试者报告四个字母组成的阵列中由位置提示的关键字母的身份。使用了四种类型的阵列:(i)不可发音的非词;(ii)可发音的非词(“假词”);(iii)关键字母受上下文字母限制最小的单词;(iv)关键字母受上下文字母限制最大的单词。所有四个字母的刺激都分两部分呈现。首先呈现一个引导阵列,其中呈现每个字母通过垂直和水平划分的两个象限的信息,然后在间隔0、20、40、80、100、120、160、320和480毫秒以及无限大(即无尾随阵列)之后,呈现互补字母部分的尾随阵列。在实验1中,一组八名受试者对四种类型的字母串、四个序列位置和十个刺激起始异步值的一百六十种组合做出反应。在实验2中,刺激起始异步值在受试者之间变化,每个值有十二名受试者做出反应。这两项研究的结果总体相似。单词条件下的表现始终优于非单词条件下的表现,并且这种差异的幅度(即单词优势效应)随着刺激起始异步增加到120毫秒而增加,然后逐渐下降。单词优势效应的幅度最初随着引导阵列和尾随阵列的分离而增加这一事实被解释为支持约翰斯顿的建议,即单词中的字母在视觉编码期间以单个字母感知和抗衰减的单词感知的形式表示,这与非单词中的字母相反,后者仅以易衰减的字母感知表示。结合单词感知的“交互式激活”模型对实验结果进行了讨论。