Branconnier R J, Cole J O, Spera K F, DeVitt D R
Exp Aging Res. 1982 Fall-Winter;8(3-4):189-93. doi: 10.1080/03610738208260364.
The Benign Senescent Forgetfulness of normal aging and the Malignant Memory Loss of Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer Type (SDAT) each have a distinct symptomatology, course, and prognosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the discriminative validity and relative predictive values of recall and recognition as diagnostic screening tests for the Malignant Memory Loss of SDAT. Thirty-six patients with mild to moderate SDAT and 40 normal aged controls were studied. Both recall and recognition showed good discriminative validity. However, analysis of recall and recognition by Bayes's Theorem revealed the relative predictive values as diagnostic screening instruments were 11% and 100% respectively. Thus, it was concluded that while both recall and recognition have discriminative validity under experimental conditions, a test of recognition is the preferred diagnostic instrument when screening for the Malignant Memory Loss of SDAT.
正常衰老的良性衰老性遗忘与阿尔茨海默型老年性痴呆(SDAT)的恶性记忆丧失各有独特的症状、病程和预后。本研究的目的是评估回忆和识别作为SDAT恶性记忆丧失诊断筛查测试的区分效度和相对预测价值。对36例轻度至中度SDAT患者和40名正常老年对照进行了研究。回忆和识别均显示出良好的区分效度。然而,通过贝叶斯定理对回忆和识别进行分析发现,作为诊断筛查工具的相对预测价值分别为11%和100%。因此,得出的结论是,虽然回忆和识别在实验条件下都具有区分效度,但在筛查SDAT的恶性记忆丧失时,识别测试是首选的诊断工具。