Suppr超能文献

智障儿童的概念学习:三种辨别学习程序的比较

Concept learning by retarded children: a comparison of three discrimination learning procedures.

作者信息

Aeschleman S R, Higgins A F

出版信息

J Ment Defic Res. 1982 Dec;26 (Pt 4):229-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1982.tb00149.x.

Abstract

The effectiveness of stimulus delay and stimulus fading procedures was compared with differential reinforcement only in training developmentally delayed children on a concept learning task. Twenty-four children were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment conditions. All three experimental conditions contained five discrimination programmes, each designed to teach the child to discriminate one pair of exemplars from the target concepts bottle and jar. Following successful completion of one training programme, a concept acquisition probe was administered to determine whether the target concepts had been engendered. Alternate presentations of successively different training programmes and concept acquisition probes were continued until the subject passed the probe, failed to complete a training programme, or completed all five training programmes. Five 'stimulus fading' subjects, three 'stimulus delay' subjects, and four 'reinforcement only' subjects learned the concepts. All children who learned to discriminate one pair of exemplars displayed conceptual behaviour after training on two or fewer pairs of exemplars. It was suggested that the absence of pronounced differences between conditions may have been due to the complexity of the task or the type of prompts employed.

摘要

在一项概念学习任务中,仅将刺激延迟和刺激消退程序的有效性与差别强化进行比较,以此训练发育迟缓儿童。24名儿童被随机分配到三种治疗条件之一。所有三种实验条件都包含五个辨别程序,每个程序旨在教会儿童从目标概念“瓶子”和“罐子”中辨别出一对示例。在成功完成一个训练程序后,进行一次概念习得探测,以确定目标概念是否已经形成。依次交替呈现不同的训练程序和概念习得探测,直到受试者通过探测、未能完成一个训练程序或完成所有五个训练程序。五名“刺激消退”受试者、三名“刺激延迟”受试者和四名“仅强化”受试者学会了这些概念。所有学会辨别一对示例的儿童在经过两对或更少示例的训练后均表现出概念性行为。研究表明,各条件之间没有明显差异可能是由于任务的复杂性或所采用提示的类型所致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验