Ganote D P, Bruhn R, Lücker P W
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1982;4(8):601-10.
Across the surface of the stomach mucosa exist large electrolytic concentration differences. While the pH value of the mucosa cells remains very constant within the range of 7.0 to 7.2, the pH value of the stomach fluctuates between 1 and 5. The differences in concentration of H-ions and other ions on both sides of the mucosa membrane result in an electrical voltage. Measurement of this voltage permits inferences to be made about the integrity of the mucosa cells. The electrical voltage and its changes can be measured and evaluated using a model developed in our Institut. Previously, there existed no studies comparing the irritation on the human stomach of solutions of Euphyllin and Theophylline. Now, using the forementioned model, we have performed such a study by examining the gastric transmural potential difference changes in nine (9) healthy subjects receiving Euphylline, Theophylline, and Ethylendiamin dihydrochloride in a cross-over design. Additionally, we have attempted to clarify if it is possible to suppress the irritation caused by Theophylline with Riopan. The investigation led to the following results: 1) The gastric irritation caused by Euphylline solution is statistically smaller than that caused by Theophylline solution. 2) The Ethylendiamin-dihydrochloride solution caused a minor irritation smaller than that of the Euphylline solution. 3) A pretreatment with Riopan reduced the irritation of the Theophylline solution.
在胃黏膜表面存在着较大的电解质浓度差异。虽然黏膜细胞的pH值在7.0至7.2的范围内保持非常恒定,但胃内的pH值在1至5之间波动。黏膜膜两侧H离子和其他离子浓度的差异导致了电压。对该电压的测量有助于推断黏膜细胞的完整性。可以使用我们研究所开发的模型来测量和评估该电压及其变化。以前,没有关于比较氨茶碱和茶碱溶液对人体胃部刺激的研究。现在,使用上述模型,我们通过在交叉设计中检查九名(9名)接受氨茶碱、茶碱和乙二胺二盐酸盐的健康受试者的胃跨膜电位差变化进行了这样一项研究。此外,我们试图弄清楚是否有可能用乐得胃抑制茶碱引起的刺激。调查得出以下结果:1)氨茶碱溶液引起的胃部刺激在统计学上小于茶碱溶液引起的刺激。2)乙二胺二盐酸盐溶液引起的刺激小于氨茶碱溶液,程度较轻。3)乐得胃预处理减轻了茶碱溶液的刺激。