Yama M F
J Acoust Soc Am. 1982 Nov;72(5):1380-3. doi: 10.1121/1.388442.
A forward-masking paradigm was used in an attempt to measure and compare "suppression effects" under one monaural system condition, NOSO, and two binaural system conditions, NOSM and NOSII. The signal was a 500-Hz tone burst of 10-ms duration (measured at the 6-dB down points) and was presented 12.5 ms after the termination of the masker. In the diotic condition, as the masker bandwidth increased, masking at first increased, reached a maximum between bandwidths of 50 and 150 Hz, and then decreased with further increases of the bandwidth. The pattern of results was very different for the dichotic conditions: Here, masking never decreased with increases in the masker bandwidth; unlike the NOSO condition, there was no evidence of a "suppression effect." These data are used to argue that diotic "suppression effects" obtained with noiseband maskers are actually produced by a combination of off-frequency listening and quality-difference cues.
采用前掩蔽范式试图测量并比较在一种单耳系统条件(NOSO)以及两种双耳系统条件(NOSM和NOSII)下的“抑制效应”。信号为持续时间10毫秒的500赫兹纯音脉冲(在6分贝衰减点测量),在掩蔽音终止后12.5毫秒呈现。在双耳同相条件下,随着掩蔽音带宽增加,掩蔽起初增加,在50至150赫兹带宽之间达到最大值,然后随着带宽进一步增加而降低。对于双耳异相条件,结果模式非常不同:在此,掩蔽从未随着掩蔽音带宽增加而降低;与NOSO条件不同,没有“抑制效应”的证据。这些数据被用于论证用噪声带掩蔽音获得的双耳同相“抑制效应”实际上是由偏离频率聆听和质量差异线索的组合产生的。