Jönsson B, Silverberg R
Scand J Soc Med. 1982;10(2):63-9. doi: 10.1177/140349488201000205.
The present study tries to examine variations in utilization rates for hospital care for ulcer disease between and within Denmark and Sweden. The focus is on how utilization rates differ but an attempt is also made to explain why regional differences occur. Hospital patient statistics from both countries show that ulcer disease accounts for 35% more bed-days per 100000 inhabitants in Denmark than in Sweden. The main source for this difference is duodenal ulcer, where the number of bed-days is 63% higher in Denmark. The differences in length of stay are negligible and the numbers of surgical operations are about the same in the two countries. The greater utilization of hospital resources in Denmark is explained mainly by the fact that more medical cases are treated as in-patients in Denmark than in Sweden. Neither mortality rates nor other data support the hypothesis that the incidence of duodenal ulcer is higher in Denmark than in Sweden. The difference between Denmark and Sweden widens when utilization rates are adjusted for differences in the age structure of the population in the two countries. There are wide variations in utilization rates between regions within both countries. The findings support the hypothesis that the intertemporal change in the technology for management of ulcer disease is one of the main reasons for variations between and within countries.
本研究试图考察丹麦和瑞典两国之间以及两国国内溃疡病住院治疗利用率的差异。重点在于利用率如何不同,但也尝试解释区域差异产生的原因。两国的医院患者统计数据显示,丹麦每10万居民中溃疡病的住院天数比瑞典多35%。这种差异的主要来源是十二指肠溃疡,丹麦的住院天数比瑞典高63%。住院时间的差异可以忽略不计,两国的手术数量大致相同。丹麦对医院资源的利用率更高,主要原因是丹麦比瑞典有更多的医疗病例作为住院患者接受治疗。死亡率和其他数据均不支持丹麦十二指肠溃疡发病率高于瑞典这一假设。当根据两国人口年龄结构的差异对利用率进行调整后,丹麦和瑞典之间的差距扩大了。两国国内不同地区的利用率存在很大差异。这些发现支持了以下假设,即溃疡病治疗技术的跨期变化是国家之间和国家内部差异的主要原因之一。