Shipley R H, Rosen T J, Williams C
Addict Behav. 1982;7(3):299-302. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(82)90059-4.
A survey of smoking cessation researchers found considerable disagreement in the measurement procedures used to determine treatment outcome. The survey investigated (1) the duration of the measurement interval used to determine abstinence and smoking rate; (2) procedures for classifying people who smoke after treatment but are abstinent at follow-up; and (3) procedures for classifying people who use marijuana or tobacco products other than cigarettes. The marked disagreement among researchers' survey responses was compounded by the failure of their published articles to explain how smoking had been measured and scored. The Discussion identifies long-term abstinence as the most critical problem; its measurement was least consistent procedurally across studies yet most important for comparing them. Recommendations are made for establishing measurement and reporting conventions.
一项针对戒烟研究人员的调查发现,在用于确定治疗效果的测量程序方面存在相当大的分歧。该调查研究了:(1)用于确定戒烟情况和吸烟率的测量间隔时长;(2)对治疗后仍吸烟但随访时已戒烟者的分类程序;(3)对使用除香烟以外的大麻或烟草制品者的分类程序。研究人员调查反馈中的显著分歧,因他们发表的文章未能解释吸烟是如何测量和计分的而更加复杂。讨论部分将长期戒烟确定为最关键的问题;其测量在各研究中的程序一致性最差,但对比较这些研究而言却最为重要。文中提出了建立测量和报告规范的建议。