Welch K, Higgins I, Oh M, Burchfiel C
Arch Environ Health. 1982 Nov-Dec;37(6):325-35. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1982.10667586.
A report by Lee and Fraumeni in 1969 linked exposure to arsenic and other contaminants to a threefold excess of respiratory cancer among 8,047 employees at the Anaconda copper smelter. We established vital status through December 1977 for a sample of 1,800 men from the original cohort. Average arsenic concentrations were estimated for each smelter department based on industrial hygiene measurements made from 1943 to 1965. Departments with similar concentrations were combined into four categories of exposure: 1) low (less than 100 micrograms/m3), 2) medium (100-499 micrograms/m3), 3) high (500-4,999 micrograms/m3) and 4) very high (greater than or equal to 5,000 micrograms/m3). Three indices of individual arsenic exposure were developed: time-weighted average, 30-day ceiling, and cumulative. Exposures to sulfur dioxide and asbestos were also examined. Smoking habits were obtained by questionnaire. Mortality was compared to that of men in the State of Montana using the modified lifetable method. A clear dose-response relationship between arsenic exposure and respiratory cancer was demonstrated. Men in the highest exposure category had a sevenfold excess. Those in the low and medium categories had a risk close to that expected. Ceiling arsenic exposure appeared to be more important than did time-weighted average exposure. Sulfur dioxide and asbestos did not appear to be important in the excess of respiratory cancer, although sulfur dioxide and arsenic exposures could not be separated completely. Smoking did not appear to be as important as arsenic exposure. Our findings suggest that had men worked only in departments with low or medium arsenic exposures (i.e., less than 500 micrograms/m3) there would have been little excess respiratory cancer. Since the estimates of arsenic exposure were based on department averages rather than on concentrations for individual jobs, these results must be interpreted with caution.
1969年,李和弗劳梅尼的一份报告指出,在安那科达铜冶炼厂的8047名员工中,接触砷和其他污染物与呼吸道癌症发病率高出三倍有关。我们确定了1977年12月前原队列中1800名男性样本的生命状况。根据1943年至1965年的工业卫生测量数据,估算了每个冶炼厂部门的平均砷浓度。砷浓度相似的部门被合并为四类接触水平:1)低(低于100微克/立方米),2)中(100 - 499微克/立方米),3)高(500 - 4999微克/立方米)和4)非常高(大于或等于5000微克/立方米)。制定了三个个体砷接触指标:时间加权平均值、30天上限值和累积值。还研究了二氧化硫和石棉的接触情况。通过问卷调查获取吸烟习惯。使用修正寿命表法将死亡率与蒙大拿州男性的死亡率进行比较。结果表明砷接触与呼吸道癌症之间存在明确的剂量反应关系。接触水平最高的男性患呼吸道癌症的风险高出七倍。低接触水平和中等接触水平的男性患癌风险接近预期。砷接触上限值似乎比时间加权平均接触更重要。二氧化硫和石棉在呼吸道癌症超额发病中似乎并不重要,尽管二氧化硫和砷的接触无法完全区分开来。吸烟似乎不如砷接触重要。我们的研究结果表明,如果男性仅在砷接触水平低或中等(即低于500微克/立方米)的部门工作,呼吸道癌症超额发病情况几乎不会出现。由于砷接触估计值是基于部门平均值而非个体工作的浓度,这些结果必须谨慎解读。