Langosch W, Brodner G, Farinelli E
Act Nerv Super (Praha). 1982;Suppl 3(Pt 1):157-62.
While Type A is predominant in 62 coronary subjects below age 40, its specificity is to be questioned because for controls the A:B ratio is very similar. Cases display significantly more hostility and loud/explosive speech than controls. During the interview, cases belonging to different Type A categories did not differ in heart rate, skin resistance responses and blood pressure, when task values are used. Furthermore, no differences between coronary A and B subjects are found on cardiological findings, inclusive severity of coronary atherosclerosis.
虽然在62名40岁以下的冠心病患者中,A型占主导,但由于对照组的A:B比例非常相似,其特异性值得怀疑。与对照组相比,病例表现出明显更多的敌意和大声/爆发性言语。在访谈过程中,当使用任务值时,属于不同A型类别的病例在心率、皮肤电阻反应和血压方面没有差异。此外,在心脏检查结果(包括冠状动脉粥样硬化的严重程度)方面,冠心病A型和B型患者之间没有发现差异。