Winter U J, Gitt A K, Blaum M, Fritsch J, Berge P G, Pothoff G, Hilger H H
Klinik III für Innere Medizin, Universität zu Köln.
Z Kardiol. 1994;83 Suppl 3:73-82.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) allows a non-invasive control of the cardiopulmonary exercise capacity. In this study, we wanted to investigate if the CPX can be securely, practicably, and accurately performed in patients with invasively documented coronary heart disease (CHD). Furthermore, we wanted to find out the clinical value of CPX in CHD diagnosis. The CPX measurements (symptom-limited; ramp program with 20 Watts increase/min; semi-supine position; continuous registration of the cardio-circulatory parameters (HR, RR, ECG), of the gas exchange parameters (O2, CO2) and of the ventilation) in 101 patients have shown that CPX is secure, accurate, and practicable. The day-to-day reproducibility is high (r > 0.8). The respiratory anaerobic threshold can be manually evaluated by means of the PET O2 criterion in 95% of the cases. The CCS-classification of angina pectoris could not accurately describe the cardiopulmonary exercise capacity as compared to the Weber-classification. The disadvantage of the Weber-classification is that it does not respect the age-, sex- and weight-dependent differences of the normal values. Our own data and results from the literature demonstrate that the anaerobic threshold, the maximum VO2 and the maximum O2-pulse are the more reduced the more coronary arteries are involved, the more reduced the left ventricular function is. But, nevertheless, the range of values shows large overlaps so that an exact differentiation, based upon these parameters, is not possible. Patients with similar functional results or degree of reduced exercise capacity have different morphological alterations. Most patients demonstrated typical ischemic cascade with anaerobic threshold, ST-segment alterations, angina pectoris and, finally, reduced max. VO2. In conclusion, CPX does not replace the traditional methods of non-invasive and invasive ischemia detection, but enables secure, practicable, and accurate measurements of the individual cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and the interaction between muscles, heart, circulation, and lungs. Possibly, CPX can be used in the near future for identifying CHD patients with low, medium or high risk.
心肺运动试验(CPX)可对心肺运动能力进行无创监测。在本研究中,我们想探究CPX是否能在有创记录的冠心病(CHD)患者中安全、可行且准确地进行。此外,我们想找出CPX在冠心病诊断中的临床价值。对101例患者进行的CPX测量(症状限制;每分钟增加20瓦的斜坡程序;半卧位;连续记录心肺循环参数(心率、呼吸频率、心电图)、气体交换参数(氧气、二氧化碳)和通气情况)表明,CPX是安全、准确且可行的。日常重复性很高(r>0.8)。在95%的病例中,可通过PET O2标准手动评估呼吸无氧阈值。与韦伯分类法相比,心绞痛的CCS分类法不能准确描述心肺运动能力。韦伯分类法的缺点是它没有考虑到正常值的年龄、性别和体重依赖性差异。我们自己的数据和文献结果表明,无氧阈值、最大摄氧量和最大氧脉搏随着涉及的冠状动脉越多、左心室功能越低而降低得越明显。但是,尽管如此,数值范围存在很大重叠,因此基于这些参数进行精确区分是不可能的。功能结果相似或运动能力降低程度相同的患者有不同的形态学改变。大多数患者表现出典型的缺血级联反应,包括无氧阈值、ST段改变、心绞痛,最终是最大摄氧量降低。总之,CPX并不能取代传统的无创和有创缺血检测方法,但能安全、可行且准确地测量个体的心肺运动能力以及肌肉、心脏、循环和肺之间的相互作用。CPX可能在不久的将来用于识别低、中、高风险的冠心病患者。