Nargund S B, Nanjarajiah H, Deneshbabu G S, Dhanlal K
Int Surg. 1982 Oct-Dec;67(4 Suppl):467-8.
A comparative evaluation of 24 patients treated by highly selective vagotomy (H.S.V.) and an equal number treated by truncal vagotomy (T.V.) with drainage is presented. Assessment of results is based on Visick grading and gastric analysis including B.A.O., M.A.O. and Hollander's insulin test. The results at the end of an average follow-up period of 21 months indicate the superiority of H.S.V.
本文介绍了对24例接受高选择性迷走神经切断术（H.S.V.）治疗的患者与同等数量接受迷走神经干切断术加引流术（T.V.）治疗的患者进行的对比评估。结果评估基于Visick分级和胃液分析，包括基础胃酸分泌量（B.A.O.）、最大胃酸分泌量（M.A.O.）和霍兰德胰岛素试验。平均随访21个月后的结果表明高选择性迷走神经切断术更具优势。
