De Palma L, Greco F, Ciarpaglini C, Caneva C
Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1982 Dec;8(4):461-7.
The authors investigated the mechanical properties of "CMW cement-antibiotic" mixtures compared with those of the standard preparation. They carried out comparative tests of tensile strength, hardness and flexion (flexion breaking load, percentage flexion, modulus of elasticity to flexion). The antibiotics used were: streptomycin, ampicillin, cefalotin, carbenicillin, rifampicin, kanamycin, gentamycin and tobramycin. The mechanical tests performed showed that the percentage reductions in the strength of the mixtures varied considerably depending on the type of antibiotic used. The reductions produced by antibiotics used in aqueous solution (gentamycin and tobramycin) were excessive. The results obtained with the other mixtures were much better; in particular, some of the values obtained with the CMW cement-cefalotin and CMW cement-streptomycin mixtures were very close to those for the standard preparation. The combination of rifampicin with CMW cement, on the other hand, prevented complete polymerization of the cement.
作者研究了“CMW 水泥-抗生素”混合物与标准制剂相比的力学性能。他们进行了拉伸强度、硬度和弯曲(弯曲断裂载荷、弯曲百分比、弯曲弹性模量)的对比试验。所使用的抗生素有:链霉素、氨苄青霉素、头孢噻吩、羧苄青霉素、利福平、卡那霉素、庆大霉素和妥布霉素。所进行的力学试验表明,混合物强度的降低百分比根据所使用抗生素的类型有很大差异。在水溶液中使用的抗生素(庆大霉素和妥布霉素)所导致的强度降低过大。其他混合物所得到的结果要好得多;特别是,CMW 水泥-头孢噻吩和 CMW 水泥-链霉素混合物所得到的一些数值非常接近标准制剂的数值。另一方面,利福平与 CMW 水泥的组合阻止了水泥的完全聚合。