• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Intensity judgements of non-sinusoidal vibrations; support for the ISO weighting method.

作者信息

Shoenberger R W

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1978 Nov;49(11):1327-30.

PMID:718578
Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to compare the independent component method and the weighting method, recommended by current vibration standards for evaluating complex vibrations. Seated subjects matched their perceptions of the intensity of various Z-axis vibrations by adjusting the intensity of a sinusoidal matching frequency. Exp. I stimuli were composed of from one to four sinusoids in the frequency range from 11--63 Hz, Exp. II stimuli were made up of from one to four third-octave bands of random vibration with center frequencies from 16--40 Hz, and Exp. III stimuli were composed of from one to four sinusoids from 2.6--16 Hz. In all three experiments, the acceleration of the matching response increased significantly as the number of sinusoids or third-octave bands in the stimulus increased. Such a relationship is not predicted by the independent component method, but is predicted by the weighting method. Moreover, when the weighted accelerations of the matching responses are compared with the weighted accelerations of the input vibrations, the correspondence is quite good for all three experiments. These results support adoption of the weighting method as the preferred procedure for evaluating complex vibration environments.

摘要

相似文献

1
Intensity judgements of non-sinusoidal vibrations; support for the ISO weighting method.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1978 Nov;49(11):1327-30.
2
Subjective effects of combined-axis vibration: III. Comparison of Y-axis and Y-plus-yaw vibrations.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1986 Nov;57(11):1075-81.
3
Comparison of the subjective intensity of sinusoidal, multifrequency, and random whole-body vibration.正弦、多频和随机全身振动主观强度的比较。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1976 Aug;47(8):856-62.
4
Subjective effects of combined-axis vibration: II. Comparison of X-axis and X-plus-pitch vibrations.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1985 Jun;56(6):559-63.
5
Psychophysical assessment of angular vibration: comparison of vertical and roll vibrations.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1979 Jul;50(7):688-91.
6
Psychophysical comparison of vertical and angular vibrations.垂直振动与角振动的心理物理学比较
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1980 Aug;51(8):759-62.
7
Subjective effects of combined-axis vibration: comparison of Y-axis and Y-plus-roll vibrations.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1984 May;55(5):387-90.
8
Intensity judgments of vibrations in the X axis, Z axis, and X-plus-Z axes.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1988 Aug;59(8):749-53.
9
Intensity judgments of vibrations in the Y axis, Z axis, and Y-plus-Z axes.Y轴、Z轴以及Y加Z轴方向振动的强度判断。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1987 Aug;58(8):783-7.
10
Discomfort judgements of translational and angular whole-body vibrations.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1982 May;53(5):454-7.