• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正弦、多频和随机全身振动主观强度的比较。

Comparison of the subjective intensity of sinusoidal, multifrequency, and random whole-body vibration.

作者信息

Shoenberger R W

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1976 Aug;47(8):856-62.

PMID:949306
Abstract

An intensity matching technique was used in two experiments to test the independent component method for evaluating complex vibration environments, recommended by current vibration standards; In the first experiment, seated subjects adjusted the intensity of a 25 Hz sinusoid to match the subjective intensity of 11, 17, 40, and 63 Hz simusoids, presented either singly or in combinations of two, three, or four frequencies. In the second experiment, 25 Hz was again used to match the subjective intensity of third octave bands of random vibration with center frequencies of 16, 20, 25, 31;5, and 40 Hz, presented either singly or in combinations of two, three, or four bands. The results showed that the acceleration of the matching response increased significantly as the number of sinusoids or third-octave bands in the stimulus increased; These findings indicate that the independent component evaluation method will underestimate the severity of complex vibration environments, and suggest that their perceived intensities may be more accurately reflected by the weighting technique included in the standards as an alternative evaluation method.

摘要

在两项实验中使用了强度匹配技术,以测试当前振动标准推荐的用于评估复杂振动环境的独立分量法;在第一个实验中,坐着的受试者调整25赫兹正弦波的强度,以匹配单独呈现或以两个、三个或四个频率组合呈现的11、17、40和63赫兹正弦波的主观强度。在第二个实验中,再次使用25赫兹来匹配中心频率为16、20、25、31.5和40赫兹的随机振动的倍频程带的主观强度,这些倍频程带单独呈现或以两个、三个或四个频带组合呈现。结果表明,随着刺激中正弦波或倍频程带数量的增加,匹配响应的加速度显著增加;这些发现表明,独立分量评估方法会低估复杂振动环境的严重性,并表明标准中包含的加权技术作为一种替代评估方法可能会更准确地反映其感知强度。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the subjective intensity of sinusoidal, multifrequency, and random whole-body vibration.正弦、多频和随机全身振动主观强度的比较。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1976 Aug;47(8):856-62.
2
Intensity judgements of non-sinusoidal vibrations; support for the ISO weighting method.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1978 Nov;49(11):1327-30.
3
Subjective effects of combined-axis vibration: comparison of Y-axis and Y-plus-roll vibrations.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1984 May;55(5):387-90.
4
Subjective response to very low-frequency vibration.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1975 Jun;46(6):785-90.
5
Subjective effects of combined-axis vibration: III. Comparison of Y-axis and Y-plus-yaw vibrations.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1986 Nov;57(11):1075-81.
6
Subjective effects of combined-axis vibration: II. Comparison of X-axis and X-plus-pitch vibrations.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1985 Jun;56(6):559-63.
7
Discomfort judgements of translational and angular whole-body vibrations.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1982 May;53(5):454-7.
8
Psychophysical comparison of vertical and angular vibrations.垂直振动与角振动的心理物理学比较
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1980 Aug;51(8):759-62.
9
Psychophysical assessment of angular vibration: comparison of vertical and roll vibrations.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1979 Jul;50(7):688-91.
10
Intensity judgments of vibrations in the Y axis, Z axis, and Y-plus-Z axes.Y轴、Z轴以及Y加Z轴方向振动的强度判断。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1987 Aug;58(8):783-7.