Hayashi T, Fujimoto K, Tadokoro S
Yakubutsu Seishin Kodo. 1981 Oct;1(1):13-9.
Different effects of methamphetamine (0.25-1 mg/kg, sc), chlorpromazine (0.5-2 mg/kg, sc), haloperidol (0.25-0.1 mg/kg, sc), diazepam (1-4 mg/kg, sc) and pentobarbital (5-20 mg/kg, sc) on Sidman avoidance response were investigated according to absence or presence of stimulus control. Thirteen adult male rats of Wistar strain were divided into two groups of 6 and 7 each, and trained under Sidman avoidance schedule (WS-group) and the same schedule associated with a 5 sec warning stimulus presentation (buzzer and light) (WS+group). There was no difference in the effect of methamphetamine between the two groups. The avoidance response was inhibited in dose-dependent manner regardless of the stimulus control after chlorpromazine and haloperidol. However, more marked inhibition was always observed in WS-group than in WS+group. Diazepam and pentobarbital also inhibited the avoidance response in WS-group when ataxia-producing doses were given, while no significant inhibition was observed after the same doses of the drugs in WS+group. Thus, the avoidance response without stimulus control was more susceptible to the drugs than that with stimulus control. The present results suggest that Sidman avoidance response is reliable to evaluate psychotropic drugs in screening test.
根据是否存在刺激控制,研究了甲基苯丙胺(0.25 - 1毫克/千克,皮下注射)、氯丙嗪(0.5 - 2毫克/千克,皮下注射)、氟哌啶醇(0.25 - 0.1毫克/千克,皮下注射)、地西泮(1 - 4毫克/千克,皮下注射)和戊巴比妥(5 - 20毫克/千克,皮下注射)对西德曼回避反应的不同影响。13只成年雄性Wistar品系大鼠被分为两组,每组分别为6只和7只,并在西德曼回避程序(WS组)以及与5秒警告刺激呈现(蜂鸣器和灯光)相关的相同程序下进行训练(WS +组)。两组之间甲基苯丙胺的效果没有差异。氯丙嗪和氟哌啶醇给药后,无论刺激控制情况如何,回避反应均以剂量依赖性方式受到抑制。然而,WS组的抑制作用总是比WS +组更明显。当给予产生共济失调剂量的地西泮和戊巴比妥时,它们也抑制了WS组的回避反应,而在WS +组给予相同剂量的药物后未观察到明显抑制。因此,无刺激控制的回避反应比有刺激控制的回避反应对药物更敏感。目前的结果表明,西德曼回避反应在筛选试验中对评估精神药物是可靠的。