Forrester J I, Raffin M J
J Aud Res. 1982 Jan;22(1):37-43.
Spondaic threshold (ST), loudness-discomfort level (LDL) for speech-shaped noise, and NU6 speech scores at 50 db HL (in quiet and at S/N = 0) were taken from 8 adults aged 34-80 yrs, with HTLs less than or equal to 20 db at .25-1 kc/s but with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing impairments beginning above 1 kc/s. S listened monaurally to a loudspeaker in an audiometric booth wearing no hearing aid in the test ear or one of 2 all-in-the-ear aids differing only in frequency response (.38-5 kc/s vs .30-7 kc/s). Gain was not changed during the experiment. Extended-range amplification for the total group was not beneficial, nor was it found generally beneficial even when speech scores in quiet or in noise for a group of 4 Ss with impairments beginning above 2 kc/s were compared with those for a group of 4 Ss with impairment beginning below 2 kc/s. However, the narrower-band aid revealed significant (0.10 level of confidence) amplification effects on speech scores compared with the unaided condition.
从8名年龄在34至80岁的成年人中获取了斯彭代克阈值(ST)、言语噪声的响度不适阈(LDL)以及在50分贝听力级(安静环境和信噪比为0时)的NU6言语得分。这些成年人在0.25至1千赫时听力损失小于或等于20分贝,但在1千赫以上开始出现中度至重度感音神经性听力障碍。受试者在听力测试室内单耳聆听扬声器,测试耳不佩戴助听器,或者佩戴两款仅频率响应不同(0.38至5千赫与0.30至7千赫)的全耳式助听器中的一款。实验过程中增益不变。对整个群体进行的扩展范围放大并无益处,即便将一组4名在高于2千赫开始出现听力障碍的受试者在安静环境或噪声环境下的言语得分与另一组4名在低于2千赫开始出现听力障碍的受试者的言语得分进行比较,也未发现总体上有好处。然而,与未佩戴助听器的情况相比,窄带助听器对言语得分显示出显著(置信水平为0.10)的放大效果。