Suppr超能文献

全科医生临床研究组11项抑郁量表的验证

Validation of the General Practitioner Clinical Research Group 11-item depression scale.

作者信息

Gringras M

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1980;8 Suppl 3:45-8.

PMID:7202817
Abstract

In trials performed by the General Practitioner Clinical Research Group two rating scales have been employed extensively to measure depression. One includes some 17 target symptoms whilst the second is a shorter scale of 11 items. Although extensively used, neither scale has been validated against other measures of depression. An attempt was made to validate the 11-item scale, completed by the physician, against the Zung self-rating depression scale and the Wakefield Inventory, both patient-completed scales. Using thirty depressed patients the correlation between the 11-item scale and the Zung was 0.59 and between the 11-item scale and the Wakefield it was 0.5. Surprisingly, although the two scales are patient-completed and purport to measure the same thing, the correlation between the Zung and the Wakefield scales was only 0.69. All the correlations were statistically significant at the 1% level.

摘要

在全科医生临床研究小组进行的试验中,两种评定量表被广泛用于测量抑郁症。一种包含约17种目标症状,而另一种是较短的11项量表。尽管被广泛使用,但这两种量表均未与其他抑郁症测量方法进行过验证。有人尝试将医生填写的11项量表与患者填写的Zung自评抑郁量表和韦克菲尔德量表进行验证。使用30名抑郁症患者,11项量表与Zung量表之间的相关性为0.59,11项量表与韦克菲尔德量表之间的相关性为0.5。令人惊讶的是,尽管这两种量表都是由患者填写且旨在测量相同的内容,但Zung量表与韦克菲尔德量表之间的相关性仅为0.69。所有相关性在1%水平上均具有统计学意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验