Calisher C H, Bailey R E
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Feb;13(2):344-50. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.2.344-350.1981.
Serological diagnoses of human infections with California serogroup viruses are usually made by means of complement fixation or hemagglutination inhibition tests or both. An analysis of antibody titers in sera from 128 humans with California (La Crosse) virus infections indicated that exclusive use of the complement fixation tests would have detected only 50% of the actual seroconversions, whereas hemagglutination inhibition and neutralization tests alone would have been sufficient to make the diagnosis in 79.3% and 84.8% of the cases, respectively. These and other results presented demonstrate that the complement fixation test is not sufficiently useful as a primary tool for diagnosis of La Crosse virus infections. We suggest the use of the hemagglutination inhibition test for preliminary screening of sera from individuals with suspect infections caused by California serogroup viruses. The neutralization test should then be used or confirmation and subtype identification. If hemagglutination inhibition and neutralization titers are high and stable, the complement fixation test should then be used as a last, but specific, resort.
人类感染加利福尼亚血清群病毒的血清学诊断通常通过补体结合试验或血凝抑制试验或两者兼用来进行。对128例感染加利福尼亚(拉克罗斯)病毒的人类血清中的抗体滴度进行分析表明,仅使用补体结合试验只能检测到实际血清转化的50%,而单独的血凝抑制试验和中和试验分别足以在79.3%和84.8%的病例中做出诊断。所呈现的这些及其他结果表明,补体结合试验作为诊断拉克罗斯病毒感染的主要工具并不足够有用。我们建议使用血凝抑制试验对疑似感染加利福尼亚血清群病毒的个体血清进行初步筛查。然后应使用中和试验进行确认和亚型鉴定。如果血凝抑制和中和滴度高且稳定,则应将补体结合试验作为最后的但具有特异性的手段使用。