Farrow S, Harrison W, Kaluzny A, Newsome K
J Community Health. 1980 Winter;6(2):92-102. doi: 10.1007/BF01318978.
An operational definition of "primary care", useful to a wide variety of professionals, has eluded researchers since the term first gained popularity. This paper presents an activity-based definition of primary care derived from ratings of 59 representative health care activities by a group of state health administrators, a group of local health department directors, and a random sample of primary care physicians practicing in North Carolina. Thirty-one activities received ratings indicating they were considered core primary care services. Examination of differences in ratings among the three groups surveyed suggested that health department directors differ from the other two groups. Consideration of the variances of activity ratings within the groups emphasizes the unique response of the health department directors and identifies activities characterized by considerable disagreement. The study includes information necessary for researchers and practitioners to form an activity-based definition of varying scope. Definitions constructed from this information should be useful in planning the evaluation efforts that involve different groups of providers, since activities provide an objective basis for agreement. Repeating the approach outlined in the paper with other provider groups in other areas of the country should lead to better understanding of intergroup and regional differences in the concept of "primary care".
自“初级保健”一词首次流行以来,对广大专业人士有用的该术语的操作性定义一直难倒了研究人员。本文提出了一种基于活动的初级保健定义,该定义源自一组州卫生管理人员、一组地方卫生部门主管以及在北卡罗来纳州执业的初级保健医生随机样本对59项代表性医疗保健活动的评级。31项活动的评级表明它们被视为核心初级保健服务。对所调查的三组之间评级差异的检验表明,卫生部门主管与其他两组不同。对组内活动评级方差的考量强调了卫生部门主管的独特反应,并确定了存在相当大分歧的活动。该研究包括研究人员和从业者形成不同范围的基于活动的定义所需的信息。根据这些信息构建的定义在规划涉及不同提供者群体的评估工作时应该会很有用,因为活动提供了达成共识的客观基础。在美国其他地区与其他提供者群体重复本文概述的方法,应该会有助于更好地理解“初级保健”概念中的群体间差异和地区差异。