Parker A W, Walsh J M, Coon M
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1976 Fall;54(4):415-38.
Primary care is the subject of many pronouncements and many recommendations for change in the literature on health care organization and delivery. Heretofore, there has been no attempt to assess the degree of agreement on the meaning of the term. This paper reports on a normative process used to construct 92 statements about important elements of primary care, and to rank these statements according to their relative degrees of importance in primary care. Three panels--nationally recognized "experts" on primary care, consumers, and public health nurses and social workers--participated in the development as well as the ranking of the statements. The rankings of the national experts are discussed in detail, and brief comparisons are made with the rankings of the consumer and public health worker panels. Experts gave a high ranking to the statements concerned directly with medical services and their linkages. All gave attention to equality and patient dignity. Consumers stressed the need to improve access to primary care services. Public health workers emphasized improvement in both access and the quality of the relationship between patients and providers. The overall findings suggest that increasing the base of participation in primary care planning may bring greater attention to patient defined needs, and that broadening of medical care objectives from medical care to a more inclusive health care is not imminent.
初级保健是医疗保健组织与服务领域众多文献中诸多声明及变革建议的主题。在此之前,尚未有人尝试评估对该术语含义的共识程度。本文报告了一个规范过程,用于构建92条关于初级保健重要要素的陈述,并根据这些陈述在初级保健中的相对重要程度进行排序。三个小组——全国公认的初级保健“专家”、消费者以及公共卫生护士和社会工作者——参与了陈述的制定及排序。详细讨论了国家专家的排序,并与消费者小组和公共卫生工作者小组的排序进行了简要比较。专家们对直接涉及医疗服务及其关联的陈述给予了高度评价。所有人都关注平等和患者尊严。消费者强调需要改善初级保健服务的可及性。公共卫生工作者强调在改善可及性以及患者与提供者关系质量方面的提升。总体研究结果表明,增加初级保健规划的参与基础可能会更加关注患者确定的需求,并且从医疗保健到更具包容性的卫生保健的医疗保健目标的拓宽并非迫在眉睫。