Till R E, Franklin L D
J Gerontol. 1981 Mar;36(2):200-10. doi: 10.1093/geronj/36.2.200.
Age differences in visual information processing were investigated in a study of monoptic backward masking. Young (18 to 22) and old (58 to 73) adults were tested in three experiments utilizing both a random visual noise and a pattern (fragments) mask, with two-letter combinations serving as target stimuli. Critical target duration needed to escape masking was measured at several mask durations in Exps. 1 and 2; critical interstimulus interval was assessed at several target durations in Exp. 3. With random noise as the mask, a small but reliable age difference was seen across the range of mask or target durations, supporting previous reports of age difference in peripheral processing. With the pattern mask as the masking stimulus, there was mixed evidence for age differences in central processing. Such age effects were clearest in Exp. 3 in which the role of luminance summation had been reduced. Control procedures in Exps. 1 and 2 tended to eliminate evidence for central masking. Results are discussed in terms of the magnitude of age differences in peripheral and central processing and in terms of procedural artifacts of previous research.
在一项关于单眼逆向掩蔽的研究中,对视觉信息处理中的年龄差异进行了调查。在三项实验中对年轻人(18至22岁)和老年人(58至73岁)进行了测试,实验同时使用了随机视觉噪声和图案(碎片)掩蔽,以两个字母的组合作为目标刺激。在实验1和实验2中,在几个掩蔽持续时间下测量了逃避掩蔽所需的关键目标持续时间;在实验3中,在几个目标持续时间下评估了关键刺激间隔。以随机噪声作为掩蔽时,在掩蔽或目标持续时间范围内观察到了微小但可靠的年龄差异,这支持了先前关于外周处理中年龄差异的报道。以图案掩蔽作为掩蔽刺激时,关于中央处理中年龄差异的证据不一。这种年龄效应在实验3中最为明显,在该实验中亮度总和的作用已被减弱。实验1和实验2中的控制程序倾向于消除中央掩蔽的证据。根据外周和中央处理中年龄差异的大小以及先前研究的程序假象对结果进行了讨论。