Allen D V, Bliss L S, Timmons J
J Speech Hear Disord. 1981 Feb;46(1):66-8. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4601.66.
This study was designed to determine the degree of agreement between standardized tests of language development and clinical judgment. The Test of Auditory Comprehension of Language (TACL), the Carrow Elicited Language Inventory (CELI), and the Sequenced Inventory of Communication Development (SICD) were used. Three-year-old white preschool children were tested individually by experienced speech-language pathologists in day-care centers. Each examiner also made a clinical judgment of normal or impaired language behavior, based on observations during the testing. The results indicated that the CELI agreed the most with the clinical judgment of the examiners, followed by the SICD and TACL. The clinical significance of these results is discussed.
本研究旨在确定语言发展标准化测试与临床判断之间的一致程度。使用了语言听觉理解测试（TACL）、卡罗语言诱导量表（CELI）和沟通发展序列量表（SICD）。在日托中心，经验丰富的言语语言病理学家对三岁白人学龄前儿童进行了个体测试。每位考官还根据测试期间的观察对正常或受损的语言行为做出临床判断。结果表明，CELI与考官的临床判断一致性最高，其次是SICD和TACL。讨论了这些结果的临床意义。
