Echterling L G, Hartsough D M, Zarle T H
Am J Community Psychol. 1980 Dec;8(6):715-25. doi: 10.1007/BF00918283.
A four-stage model of telephone helping was tested by rating 59 calls to a crisis intervention service. The rating instrument was the Crisis Call Interaction Form, a process measure with 19 behaviors in four categories: establishment of a helpful climate, assessment of the crisis, affect integration, and problem solution. Hypotheses stated that helper behaviors would vary differentially across portions (thirds) of calls. After controlling for length of call and within-call similarities, residual variances in each third of the calls were subjected to planned orthogonal comparisons. Hypotheses were generally supported: Climate decreased from first to middle third; assessment decreased in the last third; affect tended to be highest in the middle third; and problem solution increased steadily throughout the calls. However, helper behaviors from all categories were present in every portion of calls. The term "phase" was offered to replace the stage concept as a more fluid model of telephone crisis intervention.
通过对拨打给危机干预服务机构的59通电话进行评级,测试了电话帮助的四阶段模型。评级工具是《危机电话互动表》,这是一种过程测量工具,包含四个类别中的19种行为:营造有益氛围、危机评估、情感整合和问题解决。假设表明,帮助行为在通话的不同部分(三分之一)会有不同变化。在控制了通话时长和通话内的相似性之后,对通话每三分之一部分的残差方差进行了计划好的正交比较。假设总体上得到了支持:氛围从第一个三分之一部分到中间三分之一部分有所下降;评估在最后三分之一部分减少;情感在中间三分之一部分往往最高;问题解决在整个通话过程中稳步增加。然而,所有类别的帮助行为在通话的每个部分都存在。有人提出用“阶段”一词取代阶段概念,作为电话危机干预更灵活的模型。