Qureshi J V, Gibbons R J
Infect Immun. 1981 Jan;31(1):261-6. doi: 10.1128/iai.31.1.261-266.1981.
Human strains of Actinomyces viscosus and A. naeslundii differ in the time of their appearance and in their patterns of colonization in the mouth. Strains of these organisms were found to differ in their abilities to adsorb to saliva-treated hydroxyapatite (S-HA) surfaces, thought to mimic the teeth, and these differences parallel their patterns of colonizing the dentition. Thus, strains of A. viscosus tended to adsorb in higher numbers to hydroxyapatite (HA) treated with saliva of older children and adults than with saliva of younger children (ages 6 to 11). These salivary changes may account for the increased frequency with which this organism can be isolated from the mouths of children as they grow older. In contrast, strains of A. naeslundii and Streptococcus mutans did not show a preference for attaching to either type of S-HA. Strains of A. viscosus also generally adsorbed in higher numbers than A. naeslundii to HA treated with adult saliva; this may explain why higher proportions of A. viscosus are usually recoverable from the teeth of adults, even though A. naeslundii is generally present in higher proportions in saliva. Significant variation was noted between strains and between saliva samples collected from different donors. The differences in adsorptive behavior of strains of these species suggests that they are binding to different receptors in the salivary glycoprotein coating on HA surfaces. Adsorption of A. naeslundii ATCC 12104 was enhanced when S-HA was pretreated with neuraminidase, but this had little effect upon the adsorption of other Actinomyces strains tested. Adsorption of strain ATCC 12104 to S-HA was also strongly inhibited by fructose and sucrose and weakly inhibited by glucose, maltose, galactose, and lactose. However, other strains of A. naeslundii tested were affected less, or not at all, by these sugars. Adsorption of two strains of A. viscosus was not affected by any of the sugars or amines tested.
黏性放线菌和内氏放线菌的人体菌株在出现时间和口腔定植模式上存在差异。已发现这些微生物的菌株在吸附到经唾液处理的羟基磷灰石(S-HA)表面(被认为可模拟牙齿)的能力上有所不同,且这些差异与它们在牙列中的定植模式相似。因此,相较于年幼儿童(6至11岁)的唾液处理过的羟基磷灰石(HA),黏性放线菌菌株倾向于更高数量地吸附到年长儿童和成人唾液处理过的羟基磷灰石上。这些唾液变化可能解释了随着儿童年龄增长,该微生物从其口腔中分离出来的频率增加的现象。相比之下,内氏放线菌和变形链球菌菌株对两种类型的S-HA均无附着偏好。黏性放线菌菌株通常也比内氏放线菌菌株以更高数量吸附到成人唾液处理过的HA上;这或许可以解释为何通常从成人牙齿中可回收更高比例的黏性放线菌,尽管内氏放线菌在唾液中的比例通常更高。在菌株之间以及从不同供体收集的唾液样本之间观察到了显著差异。这些物种菌株吸附行为的差异表明它们在HA表面唾液糖蛋白涂层中与不同的受体结合。当S-HA用神经氨酸酶预处理时,内氏放线菌ATCC 12104的吸附增强,但这对测试的其他放线菌菌株的吸附几乎没有影响。菌株ATCC 12104对S-HA的吸附也受到果糖和蔗糖的强烈抑制,受到葡萄糖、麦芽糖、半乳糖和乳糖的弱抑制。然而,测试的其他内氏放线菌菌株受这些糖的影响较小或根本不受影响。两种黏性放线菌菌株的吸附不受测试的任何糖或胺的影响。