Suppr超能文献

通过CV和VC音节的元音过渡加元音段进行语音识别:一项随访研究。

Stop identification from vocalic transition plus vowel segments of CV and VC syllables: a follow-up study.

作者信息

Ohde R N, Sharf D J

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1981 Jan;69(1):297-300. doi: 10.1121/1.385353.

Abstract

In a recent article in the Journal [L. C. W. Pols and M. E. H. Schouten, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 1333-1337 (1978)], it was concluded that perception experiments which present CV syllables with the consonant bursts deleted invoke a "click sensation" and that this sensation has a deleterious affect on the perception of the consonants. In order to directly assess the "click sensation" hypothesis, a computer-based speech editing system was used which smooths onsets and offsets of stimuli and therefore eliminates the possibility of an acoustic click. Subjects identified voiced and voiceless stops from vocalic transition + vowel stimuli edited from CV and VC syllables. The findings were as follows: (1) Consonant identification from vocalic transition + vowel segments in VC syllables was significantly greater than that from vocalic transition + vowel segments in CV syllables; and (2) The superiority of the scores for VC vocalic transition + vowel segment was found for both voiced and voiceless stops, but it was not as great for voiced stops. Although there are differences in magnitude of findings between this study and those which employed other deletion techniques, the reliability and direction of the results were similar. The results do not support the "click sensation"hypothesis and suggest that other mechanisms must account for differences between CV and VC syllables in the perception of sound segments.

摘要

在《声学学报》[L. C. W. 波尔斯和M. E. H. 舒滕,《美国声学学会杂志》64, 1333 - 1337 (1978)]最近发表的一篇文章中,得出的结论是,呈现删除了辅音爆发部分的CV音节的感知实验会引发一种“咔哒声感觉”,并且这种感觉对辅音的感知有有害影响。为了直接评估“咔哒声感觉”假说,使用了一个基于计算机的语音编辑系统,该系统使刺激的起始和结束变得平滑,从而消除了产生声学咔哒声的可能性。受试者从由CV和VC音节编辑而来的元音过渡 + 元音刺激中识别浊音和清音塞音。研究结果如下:(1) 从VC音节的元音过渡 + 元音片段中识别辅音的能力显著高于从CV音节的元音过渡 + 元音片段中识别辅音的能力;(2) 在浊音和清音塞音中都发现了VC元音过渡 + 元音片段得分的优势,但浊音塞音的优势没有那么大。尽管本研究与采用其他删除技术的研究在结果大小上存在差异,但结果的可靠性和方向是相似的。这些结果不支持“咔哒声感觉”假说,并表明在音段感知方面,CV和VC音节之间的差异一定是由其他机制造成的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验