• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术后发声障碍的嗓音症状学

Vocal symptomatology of postoperative dysphonia.

作者信息

Wolfe V I, Ratusnik D L

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 1981 Apr;91(4):635-43. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198104000-00019.

DOI:10.1288/00005537-198104000-00019
PMID:7219009
Abstract

Vocal symptomatology of 24 patients was assessed following the removal of polyps (12 cases) and polypoid degeneration (12 cases). In addition to fundamental frequency, hoarseness type was measured using the spectrographic system developed by Yanagihara which assesses harmonic structure of phonemes relative to noise components. Mean vocal frequency (155Hz) for the polypoid degeneration group was significantly lower than mean vocal frequency for the polyp group (186Hz). There was no difference between the two groups in mean spectrographic hoarseness type. Analysis of data suggested two subgroups of postoperative dysphonia based upon vocal symptomatology: Type A--little or no hoarseness and Type B--severe hoarseness. Neither preoperative nor postoperative conditions of the vocal cords were related to the severity of hoarseness demonstrated by Type B dysphonics. Illustrative cases are presented. One possible explanation for severe postoperative dysphonia is developed.

摘要

在切除息肉(12例)和息肉样变性(12例)后,对24例患者的嗓音症状进行了评估。除了基频外,使用柳原开发的频谱系统测量嘶哑类型,该系统评估音素相对于噪声成分的谐波结构。息肉样变性组的平均嗓音频率(155Hz)显著低于息肉组的平均嗓音频率(186Hz)。两组在平均频谱嘶哑类型上没有差异。数据分析表明,根据嗓音症状,术后发声困难可分为两个亚组:A型——几乎没有或没有嘶哑,B型——严重嘶哑。B型发声困难患者的嘶哑严重程度与术前和术后声带状况均无关。文中展示了一些典型病例,并对严重的术后发声困难提出了一种可能的解释。

相似文献

1
Vocal symptomatology of postoperative dysphonia.术后发声障碍的嗓音症状学
Laryngoscope. 1981 Apr;91(4):635-43. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198104000-00019.
2
Treatment for Vocal Polyps: Lips and Tongue Trill.声带息肉的治疗:唇舌颤音。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):252.e27-252.e36. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
3
A longitudinal study of voice before and after phonosurgery for removal of a polyp.一项关于声带息肉切除术后嗓音变化的纵向研究。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2008 Oct-Nov;22(10-11):857-63. doi: 10.1080/02699200802130813.
4
[Harmonic/noise ratio and spectrographic analysis in vocal abuse pathology].[嗓音滥用病理学中的谐波/噪声比及频谱分析]
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1996 Sep-Oct;47(5):370-6.
5
Persistent hoarseness after surgical removal of vocal cord lesions.声带病变手术切除后持续性声音嘶哑。
Arch Otolaryngol. 1981 Mar;107(3):148-51. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1981.00790390014005.
6
Comparison of effects on voice of diode laser and cold knife microlaryngology techniques for vocal fold polyps.二极管激光与冷刀显微喉镜技术治疗声带息肉对嗓音影响的比较。
J Voice. 2014 May;28(3):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.10.017. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
7
The Value of Vocal Extent Measure (VEM) Assessing Phonomicrosurgical Outcomes in Vocal Fold Polyps.嗓音范围测量(VEM)在评估声带息肉显微手术结果中的价值
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):114.e7-114.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.03.016. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
8
Timing of Voice Therapy: A Primary Investigation of Voice Outcomes for Surgical Benign Vocal Fold Lesion Patients.嗓音治疗的时机:手术治疗良性声带病变患者嗓音结果的初步调查。
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):129.e1-129.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.12.005. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
9
Effects on voice by endolaryngeal microsurgery.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;256(6):312-5. doi: 10.1007/s004050050253.
10
Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of the voice in patients with vocal polyps after surgery and voice therapy.声带息肉患者术后及嗓音治疗后的嗓音声学和感知特征
J Voice. 2015 Mar;29(2):241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Oct 7.