• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison between intracutaneous and prick tests in detecting sensitizations to common Mediterranean allergens.

作者信息

Brusasco V, Crimi E, Crimi P, Valenti S

出版信息

Respiration. 1980;40(6):317-22. doi: 10.1159/000194299.

DOI:10.1159/000194299
PMID:7221200
Abstract

The role of the intracutaneous test (IC) in clinical allergy routine was evaluated comparing its results with those from the prick test, the radioallergosorbent test (RAST), and the specific bronchial provocation test (BPT). The study was carried out making an a posteriori survey of 384 patients suffering from symptoms of perennial and seasonal rhinitis and/or bronchial asthma. They were tested with the most common allergens in the Mediterranean countries; 681 prick tests and 489 IC tests were compared with RAST and 69 with BPT. The IC tests showed disagreement with RAST and BPT more frequently than prick tests: this is attributable to a lesser degree of specificity of IC test performed with the usual concentrations, and depends on the nature of the allergens. On the other hand the prick test is no less sensitive than the IC test, being the occurrence of RAST positivity in patients with negative skin tests similar for the prick and IC tests. These results support the concept of the prick test as preferable with respect to the IC test because of its specificity and sensitivity.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison between intracutaneous and prick tests in detecting sensitizations to common Mediterranean allergens.
Respiration. 1980;40(6):317-22. doi: 10.1159/000194299.
2
Diagnosis and immunotherapy of mould allergy. III. Diagnosis of Cladosporium allergy by means of symptom score, bronchial provocation test, skin prick test, RAST, CRIE and histamine release.霉菌过敏的诊断与免疫治疗。III. 通过症状评分、支气管激发试验、皮肤点刺试验、放射变应原吸附试验、酶联免疫吸附试验和组胺释放来诊断枝孢菌过敏
Allergy. 1986 Jan;41(1):57-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1986.tb00276.x.
3
[Clinical evaluation of whole blood histamine release test simultaneously testing multiple allergens--correlated with bronchial provocation test].全血组胺释放试验同时检测多种变应原的临床评价——与支气管激发试验的相关性
Arerugi. 1994 Apr;43(4):527-34.
4
[Atopy screening: prick multitest, total IgE or RAST? On the value of allergologic testing of the staff of an industrial bakery].[特应性筛查:点刺多项试验、总IgE还是放射性变应原吸附试验?关于一家工业面包厂员工的变态反应学检测的价值]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1985 Apr 6;115(14):466-75.
5
[Value of the basophil stimulation test in the diagnosis of juvenile bronchial asthma].[嗜碱性粒细胞刺激试验在儿童支气管哮喘诊断中的价值]
Klin Padiatr. 1986 Sep-Oct;198(5):395-400. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1033896.
6
Reliability of the prick-test in comparison to other techniques.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1983 Jan-Feb;11(1):5-10.
7
[Indications for the inhalation provocation test].[吸入激发试验的适应证]
Fortschr Med. 1984 May 10;102(18):503-6.
8
[Frequency of respiratory allergens involved in rhinitis and bronchial asthma in adults. Prospective study].[成人鼻炎和支气管哮喘中涉及的呼吸道变应原频率。前瞻性研究]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1986 Sep 6;116(36):1205-10.
9
Skin prick test in the diagnosis of dog dander allergy: a comparison of different extracts with clinical history, provocation tests and RAST.
Clin Allergy. 1980 Mar;10(2):121-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1980.tb02089.x.
10
House dust allergy: correlation between in vivo and in vitro diagnostic tests.
Ann Allergy. 1981 Feb;46(2):100-4.