Gerson B
Ther Drug Monit. 1980;2(3):225-32. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198007000-00005.
Formal quality control procedures have become a part of the clinical laboratory. Application of these procedures to therapeutic drug monitoring, which has been introduced into the clinical laboratory relatively recently, is incomplete. Most attention has been directed toward questions of accuracy and laboratory-to-laboratory precision, particularly with respect to antiepileptic agents. Intralaboratory precision must be addressed first, since it is fundamental to accuracy and laboratory-to-laboratory variability and most patients are treated based on results generated by a single laboratory. Intralaboratory precision data were gathered from laboratories already offering therapeutic drug monitoring services. In addition, the intralaboratory precision demands of good medical management was gathered from physicians who use therapeutic drug monitoring services. For 20 specified drugs, most laboratories reported intralaboratory precision (relative standard deviations) of 10% or less. Managing physician responses demonstrated that most require precision of 10 to 15% or 20 to 25%. Individual laboratories should use these data as an indication of the level of intralaboratory precision that may be achieved and that is required. The state of the art of intralaboratory precision is acceptable relative to medical management, but may need improvement as it contributes to laboratory-to-laboratory variability.
正式的质量控制程序已成为临床实验室的一部分。将这些程序应用于相对较新引入临床实验室的治疗药物监测,目前并不完善。大部分注意力都集中在准确性问题以及实验室间精密度上,尤其是针对抗癫痫药物。必须首先解决实验室内精密度问题,因为它是准确性和实验室间变异性的基础,而且大多数患者的治疗是基于单个实验室得出的结果。实验室内精密度数据是从已经提供治疗药物监测服务的实验室收集的。此外,良好医疗管理对实验室内精密度的要求是从使用治疗药物监测服务的医生那里收集的。对于20种特定药物,大多数实验室报告的实验室内精密度(相对标准偏差)为10%或更低。管理医生的反馈表明,大多数人要求的精密度为10%至15%或20%至25%。各个实验室应将这些数据作为可实现和所需的实验室内精密度水平的一个指标。相对于医疗管理而言,实验室内精密度的现有水平是可以接受的,但由于它会导致实验室间变异性,可能需要改进。