Illig L
Z Hautkr. 1981 Mar 15;56(6):347-67.
Like the so-called "aspirin asthma", the aspirin-induced provocation of chronic urticaria is a symptom of the intolerance syndrome. This may also be induced by various other drugs, particularly by indomethacin and food additives. The intolerance syndromes of the "Aspirin type", however, must be assigned to the "anaphylactoid reactions" in man which also include the non-immunologic reactions to radiographic contrast media and colloids in blood substitutes. It has not yet been investigated in how far the mechanisms of these three clinical types of anaphylactoid reactions are similar or identical; however, this appears to be the case at least with aspirin intolerance and anaphylactoid reactions to contrast media. According to our observations in 150 urticaria patients, the non-immunologic aspirin-induced urticaria (and probably also the "aspirin asthma") should furthermore be divided into real provocation within the meaning of a chemical Koebner phenomenon, and "aspirin urticaria" as a symptom of the intolerance syndrome as such. A rel provocation of pre-existent urticaria is much less frequent than superimposed urticaria as a mere symptom of the intolerance syndrome. An exact differentiation is only possible in patients without any clinical symptoms after additive-free diet as well as on the basis of the phenomenon of "figuration". The most important substance as mediator for intolerance urticaria is histamine. In contrast to the usual urticaria, H2-antagonists are an important adjuvant to the traditional H1-antagonists in the symptomatic therapy.
与所谓的“阿司匹林哮喘”一样,阿司匹林诱发的慢性荨麻疹是不耐受综合征的一种症状。这也可能由各种其他药物诱发,尤其是吲哚美辛和食品添加剂。然而,“阿司匹林型”不耐受综合征必须归为人的“类过敏反应”,其中还包括对放射造影剂和血液代用品中的胶体的非免疫反应。这三种临床类型的类过敏反应的机制在多大程度上相似或相同尚未得到研究;然而,至少在阿司匹林不耐受和对造影剂的类过敏反应方面似乎是这样。根据我们对150例荨麻疹患者的观察,非免疫性阿司匹林诱发的荨麻疹(可能还有“阿司匹林哮喘”)应进一步分为化学性Koebner现象意义上的真正激发,以及作为不耐受综合征本身症状的“阿司匹林荨麻疹”。预先存在的荨麻疹的再激发比作为不耐受综合征单纯症状的叠加性荨麻疹要少见得多。只有在无添加剂饮食后无任何临床症状的患者中,并基于“形态形成”现象才能进行准确区分。作为不耐受性荨麻疹介质的最重要物质是组胺。与普通荨麻疹不同,在对症治疗中,H2拮抗剂是传统H1拮抗剂的重要辅助药物。