Diamant J J, Hijmen R
J Clin Psychol. 1981 Apr;37(2):355-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198104)37:2<355::aid-jclp2270370221>3.0.co;2-1.
Compared test results of two neuropsychological test batteries, the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRNTB) and Luria's Neuropsychological Investigation (LNI), to investigate the possibility of coming to the same conclusions concerning the brain-behavior relationships with the help of neuropsychological methods based on controversial theoretical assumptions. Test data were obtained from a sample of 31 inpatients of a psychiatric hospital. The concordance concerning the presence of brain dysfunction, its lateralization, and main localization was evaluated. A high degree of agreement was found supporting the construct validity of the rests for neuropsychological assessment of psychiatric patients.
比较了两种神经心理测试组合，即霍尔斯特德－雷坦神经心理测试组合（HRNTB）和卢里亚神经心理调查（LNI）的测试结果，以研究基于有争议的理论假设，借助神经心理学方法就脑与行为关系得出相同结论的可能性。测试数据取自一家精神病医院的31名住院患者样本。评估了在脑功能障碍的存在、其定位及主要定位方面的一致性。发现高度一致，支持了这些测试对精神病患者进行神经心理评估的结构效度。
