Diamant J J
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1981 May;63(5):431-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1981.tb00693.x.
The approaches of Reitan and Luria to the brain-behaviour relationships are compared in terms of the dichotomy between clinical neuropsychology and behavioural neurology, indirect inference and direct inference, standard approach and flexible approach. The underlying neuropsychological models of Halstead and Reitan and of Luria are confronted. The outcomes of a pilot study comparing the results of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRNTB) and Luria's Neuropsychological Investigation (LNI) in Christensen's version are briefly mentioned. The possibilities of an integration of these two approaches are discussed and a step approach to the neuropsychological assessment described.
从临床神经心理学与行为神经病学、间接推理与直接推理、标准方法与灵活方法的二分法角度，对雷顿和鲁利亚研究脑与行为关系的方法进行了比较。对霍尔斯特德和雷顿以及鲁利亚的潜在神经心理学模型进行了对比。简要提及了一项初步研究的结果，该研究比较了克里斯滕森版的霍尔斯特德－雷顿神经心理成套测验（HRNTB）和鲁利亚神经心理学调查（LNI）的结果。讨论了整合这两种方法的可能性，并描述了一种神经心理学评估的逐步方法。
