Clausen O P, Thorud E, Aarnaes E
Cell Tissue Kinet. 1981 May;14(3):227-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1981.tb00528.x.
Percentage labelled mitosis (PLM) measurements were initiated at four different times during a 24-hr period and continued for 24 hr in hairless mouse epidermis. Estimates of G2 and S phase durations (mean TG2 and mean TS) were calculated. A significant number of labelled mitoses (10--20%) was seen after 30 min in all four PLM measurements and the estimated mean TG2 varied from 1.4 to 2.5 hr and was in agreement with values from PLM measurements in other epithelial tissues. These mean TG2 values were much shorter than expected from [3H]TdR double labelling experiments and from a multiparameter cell kinetic study in hairless mouse epidermis and did not reflect the circadian variations seen in these studies. The differences in estimates of phase durations can be explained by postulating two G2 cell populations; one with a rapid and another with a slow rate of cell cycle progression. The cells with the higher rate are mainly registered by the PLM method, whereas those with the lower rate largely escape detection by this method. TG2 estimates from PLM measurements in mouse epidermis therefore do not reflect the phase duration of the entire G2 population. It is also concluded that circadian variations in TS can not be accurately registered by the PLM method.
在24小时期间的四个不同时间开始对无毛小鼠表皮进行标记有丝分裂百分比(PLM)测量,并持续24小时。计算了G2期和S期持续时间(平均TG2和平均TS)的估计值。在所有四次PLM测量中,30分钟后可见大量标记有丝分裂(10%-20%),估计的平均TG2在1.4至2.5小时之间变化,与其他上皮组织中PLM测量的值一致。这些平均TG2值比[3H]TdR双标记实验以及无毛小鼠表皮的多参数细胞动力学研究预期的要短得多,并且没有反映出这些研究中观察到的昼夜变化。通过假定两个G2细胞群体可以解释期持续时间估计值的差异;一个群体细胞周期进展速度快,另一个群体细胞周期进展速度慢。速率较高的细胞主要通过PLM方法记录,而速率较低的细胞很大程度上通过该方法逃脱检测。因此,小鼠表皮PLM测量的TG2估计值不能反映整个G2群体的期持续时间。还得出结论,PLM方法不能准确记录TS的昼夜变化。