• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Microsurgical and standard removal of the protruded lumbar disc: a comparative study.

作者信息

Wilson D H, Harbaugh R

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 1981 Apr;8(4):422-7. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198104000-00003.

DOI:10.1227/00006123-198104000-00003
PMID:7242893
Abstract

The operation of lumbar discectomy has been improved steadily since its introduction by Mixter and Barr in 1934. The present standard operation represents an accumulation of techniques that became available to succeeding generations of neurosurgeons. The addition of microsurgical technique may be the most recent means to refine the process of lumbar discectomy. One hundred cases of microsurgical discectomy were compared to the same number of standard operations, all performed by one surgeon and analyzed by another. The patient profiles were the same; the operative results showed that the standard discectomy was of good quality and that microsurgical discectomy could equal it; in comparing postoperative results, however, microsurgical discectomy was superior to the standard operation: patients returned to their usual activities in half the time. The advantage of the microsurgical technique is its capacity to preserve better the integrity of normal tissue and to impose less trauma on the body. From this analysis, we conclude that microsurgical discectomy represents a small but significant refinement of standard discectomy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Microsurgical and standard removal of the protruded lumbar disc: a comparative study.
Neurosurgery. 1981 Apr;8(4):422-7. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198104000-00003.
2
Three years experience with microsurgical technique in treatment of protruded lumbar disc.显微外科技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的三年经验
J Neurosurg Sci. 1984 Jan-Mar;28(1):25-31.
3
The effect of lumbar disc surgery on postoperative pulmonary function and temperature. A comparison study of microsurgical lumbar discectomy with standard lumbar discectomy.腰椎间盘手术对术后肺功能和体温的影响。显微外科腰椎间盘切除术与标准腰椎间盘切除术的比较研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Feb;18(2):287-90. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199302000-00019.
4
"Standard" microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. "conservative" microsurgical discectomy. A preliminary study.“标准”显微外科腰椎间盘切除术与“保守”显微外科椎间盘切除术:一项初步研究
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;112(1-2):62-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01402455.
5
[Clinical analysis of 270 cases of microsurgical lumbar discectomy].270例显微腰椎间盘切除术的临床分析
No Shinkei Geka. 1991 May;19(5):429-34.
6
Microsurgical lumbar discectomy: a personal series of 300 patients with at least 1 year of follow-up.显微外科腰椎间盘切除术:300例患者的个人系列病例,随访至少1年。
Microsurgery. 1986;7(2):55-62. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920070202.
7
Microendoscopic discectomy compared with standard microsurgical discectomy for treatment of uncontained or large contained disc herniations.显微镜下椎间盘切除术与标准显微外科椎间盘切除术治疗游离型或大型包容性椎间盘突出症的比较。
Neurosurgery. 2005 Oct;57(4 Suppl):357-60; discussion 357-60. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.00000176650.71193.f5.
8
Microsurgical lumbar discectomy: preliminary report of 83 consecutive cases.显微外科腰椎间盘切除术:83例连续病例的初步报告。
Neurosurgery. 1979 Feb;4(2):137-40. doi: 10.1227/00006123-197902000-00005.
9
Comparison of Biochemical Markers of Muscle Damage and Inflammatory Response Between the Open Discectomy, Microsurgical Discectomy, and Microsurgical Discectomy Using Tubular Retractor.开放式椎间盘切除术、显微外科椎间盘切除术和使用管状牵开器的显微外科椎间盘切除术之间肌肉损伤和炎症反应的生化标志物比较
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2015 Sep;76(5):384-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393929. Epub 2015 May 29.
10
Lumbar microendoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and nuances.腰椎显微内镜下椎间盘切除术:手术技术与细微之处
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Apr;158(4):749-753. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2743-2. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Anatomical Variations That Can Lead to Spine Surgery at the Wrong Level: Part III Lumbosacral Spine.可能导致脊柱手术节段错误的解剖变异:第三部分 腰骶椎
Cureus. 2020 Jul 28;12(7):e9433. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9433.
2
Anatomical Variations That Can Lead to Spine Surgery at the Wrong Level: Part I, Cervical Spine.可能导致脊柱手术节段错误的解剖变异:第一部分,颈椎
Cureus. 2020 Jun 17;12(6):e8667. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8667.
3
Surgical training in spine surgery: safety and patient-rated outcome.脊柱外科手术培训:安全性和患者评定结果。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Apr;28(4):807-816. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05883-9. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
4
Management of Postoperative Discitis: A Review of 31 Patients.术后椎间盘炎的管理:31例患者的回顾
Asian J Neurosurg. 2018 Jul-Sep;13(3):703-706. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_233_16.
5
Accuracy and evaluation of irradiation of novel localization devices with unique three-dimensional structures in microendoscopic spine surgery.新型三维结构定位装置在显微内镜脊柱手术中的照射准确性及评估
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Apr;26(3):253-8. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1747-1. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
6
A history of lumbar disc herniation from Hippocrates to the 1990s.从希波克拉底到20世纪90年代的腰椎间盘突出症病史。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):1885-95. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3633-7.
7
Management of postoperative spinal infections.术后脊柱感染的管理
World J Orthop. 2012 Nov 18;3(11):182-9. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v3.i11.182.
8
Postoperative infections of the lumbar spine: presentation and management.腰椎术后感染:表现与处理。
Int Orthop. 2012 Feb;36(2):439-44. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1427-z. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
9
Timing and minimal access surgery for sciatica: a summary of two randomized trials.坐骨神经痛的手术时机与微创手术:两项随机试验综述
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 May;153(5):967-74. doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-0983-8. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
10
Results of lumbar discectomy: a study using 15 different evaluation methods.腰椎间盘切除术的结果:使用 15 种不同评估方法的研究。
Eur Spine J. 1992 Jun;1(1):20-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00302137.