Suppr超能文献

“标准”显微外科腰椎间盘切除术与“保守”显微外科椎间盘切除术:一项初步研究

"Standard" microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. "conservative" microsurgical discectomy. A preliminary study.

作者信息

Striffeler H, Gröger U, Reulen H J

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Berne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;112(1-2):62-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01402455.

Abstract

The "conservative" microsurgical lumbar discectomy described by Williams for the treatment of herniated lumbar disc is compared in a retrospective study with the standard microsurgical technique of Caspar and Loew. In order to enable such a retrospective comparison, a special randomization had to be chosen. The data concerning outcome are based on a questionnaire, in which the patient can describe his actual health situation. The result in the group of 56 patients operated on by the Williams technique with a mean follow-up of 27 months is excellent or good in 89% vs. 74% in the standard technique group. Reoperations due to a recurrence were identical in both groups (3.6% and 3.9%).

摘要

在一项回顾性研究中,将Williams描述的用于治疗腰椎间盘突出症的“保守”显微外科腰椎间盘切除术与Caspar和Loew的标准显微外科技术进行了比较。为了进行这种回顾性比较,必须选择一种特殊的随机化方法。关于结果的数据基于一份问卷,患者可以在问卷中描述自己目前的健康状况。采用Williams技术手术的56例患者,平均随访27个月,结果显示,89%的患者效果为优或良,而标准技术组这一比例为74%。两组因复发而进行再次手术的比例相同(分别为3.6%和3.9%)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验