Striffeler H, Gröger U, Reulen H J
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Berne, Switzerland.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;112(1-2):62-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01402455.
The "conservative" microsurgical lumbar discectomy described by Williams for the treatment of herniated lumbar disc is compared in a retrospective study with the standard microsurgical technique of Caspar and Loew. In order to enable such a retrospective comparison, a special randomization had to be chosen. The data concerning outcome are based on a questionnaire, in which the patient can describe his actual health situation. The result in the group of 56 patients operated on by the Williams technique with a mean follow-up of 27 months is excellent or good in 89% vs. 74% in the standard technique group. Reoperations due to a recurrence were identical in both groups (3.6% and 3.9%).
在一项回顾性研究中,将Williams描述的用于治疗腰椎间盘突出症的“保守”显微外科腰椎间盘切除术与Caspar和Loew的标准显微外科技术进行了比较。为了进行这种回顾性比较,必须选择一种特殊的随机化方法。关于结果的数据基于一份问卷,患者可以在问卷中描述自己目前的健康状况。采用Williams技术手术的56例患者,平均随访27个月,结果显示,89%的患者效果为优或良,而标准技术组这一比例为74%。两组因复发而进行再次手术的比例相同(分别为3.6%和3.9%)。