Suppr超能文献

“标准”显微外科腰椎间盘切除术与“保守”显微外科椎间盘切除术:一项初步研究

"Standard" microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. "conservative" microsurgical discectomy. A preliminary study.

作者信息

Striffeler H, Gröger U, Reulen H J

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Berne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;112(1-2):62-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01402455.

Abstract

The "conservative" microsurgical lumbar discectomy described by Williams for the treatment of herniated lumbar disc is compared in a retrospective study with the standard microsurgical technique of Caspar and Loew. In order to enable such a retrospective comparison, a special randomization had to be chosen. The data concerning outcome are based on a questionnaire, in which the patient can describe his actual health situation. The result in the group of 56 patients operated on by the Williams technique with a mean follow-up of 27 months is excellent or good in 89% vs. 74% in the standard technique group. Reoperations due to a recurrence were identical in both groups (3.6% and 3.9%).

摘要

在一项回顾性研究中,将Williams描述的用于治疗腰椎间盘突出症的“保守”显微外科腰椎间盘切除术与Caspar和Loew的标准显微外科技术进行了比较。为了进行这种回顾性比较,必须选择一种特殊的随机化方法。关于结果的数据基于一份问卷,患者可以在问卷中描述自己目前的健康状况。采用Williams技术手术的56例患者,平均随访27个月,结果显示,89%的患者效果为优或良,而标准技术组这一比例为74%。两组因复发而进行再次手术的比例相同(分别为3.6%和3.9%)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验