Wu A C, Hu Y H
Am J Chin Med. 1980 Winter;8(4):313-30. doi: 10.1142/s0192415x8000030x.
Over two years the authors led a massive, government-supported survey of 2,000 Taiwanese families, half urban and half rural, to determine what actions the family would take when faced with disease or health problems. The major alternatives of folk healing, Chinese traditional medicine, and Western-oriented approaches were found to be frequently combined, and often supplemented by self diagnosis and self-medication. Thirty Chinese students entered the 2,000 families' homes for lengthy interviews covering a wide range of socio-demographic variables as well as medical behaviors. Cooperation of informants was outstanding, and the plentiful data from this large sample should provide ample ground for future studies and interpretations. The statistics substantially documented some findings suggested by earlier researchers: (a) that 90% of Taiwanese families combine a variety of approaches in warding off and treating illnesses (1); (b) that there is somewhat higher reliance on purely Western methods among young urban nuclear families, and among mainland-born Christians, than in the rural areas (2); and (c) that Taiwanese families avoid bringing mental health problems to medical or psychiatric health facilities (3). The statistics bear out some fairly predictable conclusions, such as: (a) Western medical methods are known and used more widely in the city than in the country (cf. "a" below); (b) there is more ignorance of facilities and medicines of all kinds in the country than in Taipei; and (c) traditional Chinese medicine is somewhat more used in the country than in Taipei. In addition, some fairly startling new developments are worth noting, including that (a) there is less rural/urban difference than expected--97-99% use some Western methods at some times; (b) while almost no one relies solely on folk healing, more city-dwellers use it (as well as massage and acupuncture) than do rural folk; and (c) urban families often go to private doctors, ignorant of their local public health stations.
在两年时间里,作者主导了一项由政府支持的大规模调查,对象是2000个台湾家庭,其中一半是城市家庭,一半是农村家庭,目的是确定这些家庭在面对疾病或健康问题时会采取什么行动。研究发现,民间疗法、中医和西医等主要替代方法经常被结合使用,并且常常辅以自我诊断和自我用药。30名中国学生走进这2000个家庭进行长时间访谈,内容涵盖广泛的社会人口统计学变量以及医疗行为。受访者的合作非常出色,来自这个大样本的丰富数据应为未来的研究和解读提供充足依据。这些统计数据充分证实了早期研究人员提出的一些发现:(a) 90%的台湾家庭在预防和治疗疾病时会结合多种方法(1);(b) 年轻的城市核心家庭以及出生在大陆的基督徒比农村地区的家庭对纯西医方法的依赖程度略高(2);(c) 台湾家庭避免将心理健康问题带到医疗或精神卫生机构(3)。这些统计数据也证实了一些相当可预测的结论,比如:(a) 西医方法在城市比在农村更知名且使用更广泛(参见下文“a”);(b) 农村地区对各类医疗设施和药品的了解比台北更少;(c) 中医在农村地区的使用比台北略多。此外,一些相当惊人的新进展值得注意,包括:(a) 城乡差异比预期的要小——97%至99%的人在某些时候会使用一些西医方法;(b) 虽然几乎没有人完全依赖民间疗法,但城市居民使用民间疗法(以及按摩和针灸)的比例比农村居民更高;(c) 城市家庭经常去看私人医生,却不知道当地的公共卫生站。