Mates S, Sidel V W
Am J Public Health. 1981 Jul;71(7):687-93. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.7.687.
Weighted process criteria based on chart review and weighted outcome criteria based on telephone interview were used to assess the quality of care for adult patients with asthma in the emergency rooms of a municipal and a voluntary hospital which share medical personnel. Process scores were highly correlated with 24-hour outcome scores at both hospitals but not with 7-day outcome scores. Our findings suggest that appropriate weighted process and outcome criteria are valid and useful methods for quality assessment, and underline the importance of choice of an appropriate "time window" for assessment of outcome. In addition, these assessment methods provide important "feedback" information for those providing care in the emergency room. (Am J Public Health 1981;71:687-693)
基于病历审查的加权过程标准和基于电话访谈的加权结果标准,被用于评估一家市立医院和一家志愿医院急诊室中成年哮喘患者的护理质量,这两家医院共享医务人员。两家医院的过程评分与24小时结果评分高度相关,但与7天结果评分无关。我们的研究结果表明,适当的加权过程和结果标准是质量评估的有效且有用的方法,并强调了选择合适的“时间窗口”来评估结果的重要性。此外,这些评估方法为在急诊室提供护理的人员提供了重要的“反馈”信息。(《美国公共卫生杂志》1981年;71:687 - 693)