Suppr超能文献

使用导管尖端速度换能器对主动脉瓣关闭不全进行定量分析。

Quantitation of aortic insufficiency using a catheter-tip velocity transducer.

作者信息

Nichols W W, Pepine C J, Conti C R, Christie L G, Feldman R L

出版信息

Circulation. 1981 Aug;64(2):375-80. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.64.2.375.

Abstract

Bidirectional instantaneous aortic root blood flow was measured in 18 patients with aortic insufficiency (AI) using a catheter-tip velocity transducer. The magnitude of AI was quantitated by determining total forward systolic flow from the area of the flow velocity curve above the zero baseline and regurgitant diastolic flow from the curve area below the baseline. Effective forward flow (stroke volume) was calculated as the difference between total forward systolic flow and regurgitant diastolic flow. Regurgitant fraction was determined as the ratio of regurgitant flow to total forward flow. These data were compared with conventional angiographic estimates (1+ to 4+) of the degree of insufficiency. Velocity transducer determination of regurgitant fraction was 26% in the patient with 1+ AI, 37% (31-48%) in 2+ AI, 49% (35-61%) in 3+ AI and 72% in 4+ AI (regurgitant fraction vs angiographic grade, r = 0.84). Regurgitant flow per diastole was 9 ml in the patient with 1+ AI, 39 ml (20-49 ml) in 2+ AI, 57 ml (31-102 ml) in 3+ AI and 183 ml (143 and 223 ml) in 4+ AI (regurgitant diastolic flow vs angiographic grade, r = 0.73). Good correlation (r = 0.90) was found between values of regurgitant flow obtained from the left ventriculogram and those obtained using the velocity transducer. Although the overall association was good, wide, variability in regurgitant fraction and regurgitant flow was found in the 15 patients with 2+ to 3+ AI. These results suggest that the electromagnetic velocity catheter offers a simple technique for quantitating AI.

摘要

使用导管尖端速度换能器对18例主动脉瓣关闭不全(AI)患者进行双向瞬时主动脉根部血流测量。通过确定零基线以上流速曲线区域的总前向收缩期血流以及基线以下曲线区域的反流舒张期血流来量化AI的程度。有效前向血流(每搏量)计算为总前向收缩期血流与反流舒张期血流之差。反流分数确定为反流血流与总前向血流之比。将这些数据与传统血管造影对反流程度的估计(1+至4+)进行比较。对于1+级AI患者,速度换能器测定的反流分数为26%,2+级AI患者为37%(31 - 48%),3+级AI患者为49%(35 - 61%),4+级AI患者为72%(反流分数与血管造影分级,r = 0.84)。1+级AI患者的每舒张期反流流量为9 ml,2+级AI患者为39 ml(20 - 49 ml),3+级AI患者为57 ml(31 - 102 ml),4+级AI患者为183 ml(143和223 ml)(反流舒张期血流与血管造影分级,r = 0.73)。从左心室造影获得的反流流量值与使用速度换能器获得的值之间发现良好的相关性(r = 0.90)。尽管总体相关性良好,但在15例2+至3+级AI患者中,反流分数和反流流量存在广泛的变异性。这些结果表明,电磁速度导管提供了一种量化AI的简单技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验