三种抗生素敏感性检测方法的比较（作者译）
[Comparison of three methods of measuring antibiotic sensitivities (author's transl)].
作者信息
Dupeyron C, Vuillemin N, Bories C, Leluan G, Youcef A
出版信息
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1981;39(2):61-8.
PMID:7258748
Abstract
Two semi-automatic methods of measuring antibiotic sensitivities were compared to the disk method for everyday use in a bacteriology laboratory. The reproducibility, compared with 3 strains, proved satisfactory, the highest was the API method. There appeared to be few discrepancies between the semi-automatic methods and the disk method. Part of the latter may be explained by the difference of critical concentrations. Others, routine for a few antibiotics, merit more complete study.
摘要
在细菌学实验室日常工作中，将两种半自动抗生素敏感性测量方法与纸片法进行了比较。与3种菌株相比，其重现性令人满意，其中最高的是API法。半自动方法与纸片法之间似乎存在较少差异。后者部分原因可能是临界浓度的差异。其他一些差异，对于几种抗生素来说是常规现象，值得进行更全面的研究。
相似文献
1
[Comparison of three methods of measuring antibiotic sensitivities (author's transl)].三种抗生素敏感性检测方法的比较（作者译）
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1981;39(2):61-8.
2
3
4
5
[Accelerated radioisotope method of determining cholera vibrios' sensitivity to antibiotics].
Antibiotiki. 1980 May;25(5):353-6.
6
[A micromethod for studying the sensitivity of anaerobic bacteria to antibiotics].[一种研究厌氧菌对抗生素敏感性的微量方法]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1983;41(2):113-22.
7
[Reliability of the bacterial identification tests and of antibiotic sensitivity tests made with automatic methods].[采用自动方法进行的细菌鉴定试验和抗生素敏感性试验的可靠性]
Quad Sclavo Diagn. 1981 Mar;17(1):61-72.
8
[Direct urinary antibiotic sensitivity studies. A rapid method of therapeutic orientation in a urology department (author's transl)].[直接尿液抗生素敏感性研究。泌尿外科治疗导向的一种快速方法（作者译）]
Nouv Presse Med. 1979 Oct 15;8(39):3127-9.
9
Zotero 插件