• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科急症护理机构中的算法指导分诊:一项回顾性研究

Algorithm-directed triage in a pediatric acute care facility: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Wilson L O, Wilson F P, Canales L

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1981 Aug;10(8):427-31. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(81)80311-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(81)80311-3
PMID:7258757
Abstract

Algorithm-directed triage by nonprofessionals was used to safely assign care urgency categories to 22,934 walk-in patients under 13 years of age during 1978. Of all patients, 16.7% were categorized as having urgent or potentially urgent problems at triage. Of those patients admitted, 79.12% received these urgency classifications. Additionally, 72.13% of all patients received an acute minor illness care urgency classification. Of patients admitted, 20.87% had an acute minor illness classification. A total of 11.16% of all patients received a routine or non-urgent classification. No patients admitted had been triaged to this non-urgent classification. As determined by review of records of 91 patients admitted from the acute care facility, the system safely identifies both high- and low-risk walk-in populations.

摘要

1978年,非专业人员采用算法指导的分诊方法,为22934名13岁以下的急诊患者安全地划分护理紧急程度类别。在所有患者中,16.7%在分诊时被归类为有紧急或潜在紧急问题。在那些入院的患者中,79.12%得到了这些紧急程度分类。此外,所有患者中有72.13%被归类为急性轻症护理紧急程度。在入院患者中,20.87%属于急性轻症分类。所有患者中共有11.16%被归类为常规或非紧急类别。没有入院患者被分诊到这个非紧急类别。通过对91名从急性护理机构入院患者的记录审查确定,该系统能安全地识别高风险和低风险的急诊人群。

相似文献

1
Algorithm-directed triage in a pediatric acute care facility: a retrospective study.儿科急症护理机构中的算法指导分诊:一项回顾性研究
Ann Emerg Med. 1981 Aug;10(8):427-31. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(81)80311-3.
2
Algorithm-directed triage of pediatric patients. A prospective study.儿科患者的算法指导分诊。一项前瞻性研究。
JAMA. 1980 Apr 18;243(15):1528-31.
3
Computerized triage of pediatric patients: automated triage algorithms.
Ann Emerg Med. 1981 Dec;10(12):636-40. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(81)80087-x.
4
Evening triage clinic improves patient care.晚间分诊诊所改善了患者护理。
Times. 1981 Jun;22(5):17-9.
5
Safety of the Manchester Triage System to Detect Critically Ill Children at the Emergency Department.曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊科检测重症儿童的安全性。
J Pediatr. 2016 Oct;177:232-237.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.068. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
6
Computerized algorithm-directed triage in the emergency department.急诊科的计算机化算法指导分诊
Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Feb;18(2):141-4. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80102-7.
7
Manchester triage system in paediatric emergency care: prospective observational study.儿科急诊护理中的曼彻斯特分诊系统:前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ. 2008 Sep 22;337:a1501. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1501.
8
[Triage: (medico-) legal implications].分诊:(医学)法律影响
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(5):413-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.020. Epub 2010 Jun 20.
9
Predictors of critical care admission in emergency department patients triaged as low to moderate urgency.分诊为低至中度紧急程度的急诊科患者重症监护入院的预测因素。
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Apr;65(4):818-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04938.x. Epub 2009 Feb 9.
10
The formation and design of the TRIAGE study--baseline data on 6005 consecutive patients admitted to hospital from the emergency department.TRIAGE研究的组建与设计——来自急诊科连续收治的6005例患者的基线数据
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Dec 1;23:106. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0184-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality Metrics and Systems Transformation: Are We Advancing Alcohol and Drug Screening in Primary Care?质量指标和系统转型:我们是否在推进初级保健中的酒精和药物筛查?
Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun;53(3):1702-1726. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12716. Epub 2017 May 31.
2
Triage system for rural hospital emergency services: Determining how long patients can wait.农村医院急诊服务的分诊系统:确定患者可等待的时长。
Can Fam Physician. 1991 May;37:1252-66.
3
The pediatric walk-in clinic: competition for the private practitioner.儿科即时诊所:对私人执业医生的竞争
Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Apr 15;130(8):1003-5.