Kingston D J
Avian Dis. 1981 Apr-Jun;25(2):513-6.
The use of a culture of a 5-g litter sample and the use of drag swab to detect Salmonellae infections in broiler and parent breeding flocks were compared to determine sensitivity of the techniques. The methods were equally sensitive in 32 breeding houses. Both identified the same sheds as being contaminated, and the identical serotypes were recovered. In broiler flocks, however, contamination of 7 of 13 sheds was detected with drag swabs, whereas only 5 were detected by litter culture. In a repeat experiment in broiler sheds, 3 sheds were detected as positive by the culture of litter, 9 by drag-swab culture. All sheds found positive by culture of cacae at processing had been identified by drag-swab culture during the life of the broilers. It was concluded that drag-swab culture was a reliable and cheap method of monitoring large numbers of chicken flocks for infections with Salmonella spp.
比较了使用5克垫料样本培养物和使用拖拭法检测肉鸡和种鸡群中沙门氏菌感染的情况,以确定这些技术的敏感性。在32个鸡舍中,这两种方法的敏感性相同。两者都识别出相同的受污染鸡舍,且分离出相同的血清型。然而,在肉鸡群中,拖拭法检测出13个鸡舍中有7个受到污染,而垫料培养仅检测出5个。在肉鸡舍的重复试验中,垫料培养检测出3个鸡舍呈阳性,拖拭法培养检测出9个。在肉鸡饲养期通过拖拭法培养识别出的所有在屠宰时粪便培养呈阳性的鸡舍。得出的结论是,拖拭法培养是监测大量鸡群沙门氏菌感染的一种可靠且廉价的方法。