Doiron M J, Bernardino M E
Cancer. 1981 Jun 1;47(11):2581-4. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810601)47:11<2581::aid-cncr2820471112>3.0.co;2-8.
The results of radionuclide (RN) liver scans, computed tomography (CT), and ultrasonography (US) were compared in 163 patients. Thirty-eight patients had all three studies, while ten were examined by CT and RN liver scans. One hundred fifteen patients had only US and RN studies. Radionuclide liver scanning demonstrated more false positive and negative studies than CT or US. Also, CT and US demonstrated more areas of metastasis during a single examination than RN liver scans. Ultrasonography displayed roughly the same accuracy of CT when a technically adequate examination was obtained. However, US was hampered by technically inadequate studies in 19% of 153 patients because of interfering intestinal gas. Computed tomography proved the most accurate and reliable modality in 48 patients.
对163例患者的放射性核素（RN）肝脏扫描、计算机断层扫描（CT）和超声检查（US）结果进行了比较。38例患者接受了所有三项检查，10例接受了CT和RN肝脏扫描检查。115例患者仅接受了US和RN检查。放射性核素肝脏扫描显示出比CT或US更多的假阳性和假阴性检查结果。此外，在单次检查中，CT和US显示出比RN肝脏扫描更多的转移灶区域。当获得技术上足够的检查时，超声检查显示出与CT大致相同的准确性。然而，在153例患者中有19%因肠道气体干扰导致技术上不充分的检查，从而妨碍了US检查。计算机断层扫描在48例患者中被证明是最准确和可靠的检查方式。
